if darwin is right, men in future will have no nuts?

Question

being kicked in the nuts hurt so much and its the biggest biological weakness to a man. if darwin's evolution is right, men will become "nut-less" in order to survive better?

Answer 1

=) i like what you are thinking....

Answer 2

Nature selects and retains those biological features required to propagate life.

Nature also retains those attributes which are used while allowing neglected physical features to degenerate and be lost in the process of evolution.

Since nature needs man's nuts to ensure the propagation of the species we need not worry about mankind loosing them.

One point worth considering is that man is negecting the physical body because of his dependence on machines and automation. These days to go around the block to visit a friend or the neghbourhood grocery, most city dwellers use their car. As a consequence, the muscular part of the body feels it is no longer required. If man continues on this evolutionary path in a million years humans will evolve into large brains sitting on puny bodies.

Answer 3

NOnoNO---Evolution only works through gradual and RANDOM mutation and natural selection. You don't lose something via evolution just because it is prone to pain, or just because we think it's useless, or because we choose not to have a set of body parts.

This is how it would work:
If men, through mutation, acquire a trait of having no balls (yet oddly enough are still fertile and can produce sperm in some way), are better able to survive, attract a partner, and mate and reproduce, then we would perhaps have men with no testicles in the future.

I haven't heard of anyone who died from pain per se. Pain itself is adaptive because it signals us that damage has been done and tells us to get away from immediate danger. If you didn't feel pain in the balls by being kicked there, then you would not try to protect your testicles. Your testicles would be damaged and you would not be able to reproduce. Thus, people who don't feel pain by being kicked in the nuts would die out by natural selection, because they would not be able to care for their delicate testicles. Thus, it's not only OK in the bigger picture to feel pain by being kicked in the nuts. The nuts, and the pain, are in fact, necessary.

Read on the theory, man.

Answer 4

it is really sensitive because it is the source of life. that is how important it is so take very good care of it. i do believe since it is a weak part of the Male's body it will eventually develop it's own protection so expect future generation to have hard nuts and experience hard-on non stop just to defend those precious nuts. future generations will have a different fashion considering these changes. underpants will be completely different. built-in bulges will have to be added. i think i am going nuts.

Answer 5

It may hurt,but it also makes them swell up.So they become larger not smaller.As everybody knows, the monkey with the biggest nuts is likely to survive longer than the monkeys with small nuts or none.
Girls go ape over monkeys with big nuts.

Answer 6

No...because nuts are of the highest order for survival. Like an armadillo, men will eventually have armored plates protecting their jewels.

Answer 7

this is not correct. darwins evolution is like we lose things that we have no use for. do you like ur nuts? do you have use for them? if so, men in the future will in fact have nuts.

Answer 8

I think reproduction is a pretty important part of evolution. Nuts play a big part here.

Answer 9

Well, then, your species will grow extinct and women`s rights activists will have less to fight about and will have a hard time looking for another job...What about the lesbians? I think they will become powerful heads of governments in the future.

Answer 10

w/o nuts means no sperm being made which means end of mankind.

Answer 11

how are we to make semen needed to fertilise women in order for them to bare children and keep our species alive without them!!