Jsut cruoius ...
2006-08-17 22:22:41 · 32 answers · asked by johninmelb 4 in Education & Reference ➔ Words & Wordplay
Tnahks to tsohe jsut cpoynig the txet of the oginiral eaiml in, jsut binrgnig it to a new aidecune!
Its atuaclly qiute hrad to tpye lkie tihs ...
2006-08-17 22:37:23 · update #1
Oh my god, it must be true. I actually understood Insincere's answer straight away!
2006-08-18 00:20:33 · update #2
Uuabbceefgiikllnnve!
2006-08-17 23:44:50 · answer #1 · answered by insincere 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg
The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid! Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer inwaht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh? Yaeh, and I awlyas thought slpeling was ipmorantt.
2006-08-17 22:31:47 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
SEPLLNIG LSEOSN
Aoccdrnig to a rscheearh at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitil raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe booldy amzanig, huh?
2006-08-17 22:35:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not really true.
There are sentances that would be like yours that are impossible to read.
Tihs is plbissoy an elpmaxe of a scnatnee taht is hrad to raed.
I read a really good article about it on the net somewhere, but can't find it now. Will try and hunt it down.
2006-08-17 23:56:39 · answer #4 · answered by ◄ Mal ► 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How fnaicatinsg!
I Bleveie tihs is ture! And waht blilanit nwes for dslyxeci's! Tehy dno't hvae to konw how to slepl aynawy!
2006-08-17 22:56:10 · answer #5 · answered by Totty D 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is it true that you only require the first and last letters of a word in place to understand whats written.
YES
2006-08-17 22:29:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes tahts ture
2006-08-17 22:29:47 · answer #7 · answered by Mikillah 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well I read your question with no problems at all so I would say a definite YES . How weird is that, but I don't understand why !.
2006-08-17 22:32:20 · answer #8 · answered by Lyn I 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yep I've seen this be for and it's true.
Really confuses the spell checker
2006-08-17 22:34:56 · answer #9 · answered by angelcake 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's true, the evidence is, although I'm a foreigner (German), I were able to understand and resolve your question!
2006-08-17 22:39:49 · answer #10 · answered by montanus 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋