On his own side.
2006-08-17 22:06:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
George Bush and the Neocons are on their own side as Capitalists. Oil resources are the only real thing our President is protecting for his Oil Mogul buddies. That includes the Arab Dictators of Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Sierra, and Israel. China is involved with India and Russia. It's sad isn't it, that they have no humanity for human lives, and use war as the smoke screen, and cover up. You see as a view of humanity the U.N. and America with it's allies would put a stop to the slaughter and genocide going on in Darfur Africa, but they all just ignore it...I don't believe in George Bush and his present Administrations policies as a method of spreading Democracy. I now know the NEOCON Republicans have no idea what Democracy is with Bush's results as a leader.
2006-08-17 23:10:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush is on the side of freedom and democracy in the Middle East. I don't think his intent is for the Middle East to destroy each other so he can help them out later. No, he wants to bring peace to the Middle East and he has to do that by eliminating extreme terrorist organizations like the Hezbollah. And I think the reason the world hates America is because they want to be America but can only grovel at our achievements in this world.
2006-08-17 22:02:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by Khali sucks 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Bush is on Bush's side. What makes Bush money and finances Bush's Friends decides his actions. If People hate Americans because of Bushes actions then they need to take there heads out of their @##'s, clean the **** out of there ears, and realize the American people have very little ability to stop him. Only Congress can do that and its currently run by idiots at the moment.
2006-08-17 22:14:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by t-bomb 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Devil.
The Bush administration was informed in advance and gave the "green light" to Israel's military strikes against Hizbollah with plans drawn up months before two Israeli soldiers were seized it has been claimed.
The US reportedly considered Israel's actions as a necessary prerequisite for a possible strike against Iran. A report by a leading investigative reporter says that earlier this summer Israeli officials visited Washington to brief the government on its plan to respond to any Hizbollah provocation and to "find out how much the US would bear".
The officials apparently started their inquiries with Vice-President Dick Cheney, knowing that if they secured his support, obtaining the backing of President Bush and Condoleezza Rice would be easier.
2006-08-17 21:59:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
certainly....do you imagine he's a few type of mastermind! lol... he can somewhat talk,he's only an effective ole boy,he's out for the people who can ahead his and his households time table. he's out for the wealthy,the oil people,the great agency people he's purely a confirm head,he must be.the genuine ability is in the back of the scenes.
2016-11-05 02:03:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The middle east crisis has been approached by several USA presidents in a lot of different ways and means. Mr. Bush simply since he came to power, just ignored this crisis.
Bush has been supporting the Israeli government in all its decisions. However, Mr. Bush has differnet plans for the Middle East:
- Oil is one key factor for these plans
- Israel's security is another
- Command over this area to stop the new Chinese Empire (economical) from spreading.
- the emerging markets in the middle east (the new one he calls which includes Iran, Pakistand, Afghanistan)
To start with, the Middle East is the arab countries situated in the gulf area and the levant. Mr. Bush has added Iran, Pakistan, Turkey, and Afghanistan to it. What is his sole aim?
To have a new middle east securing the oil wells there in addition to having a huge consumer market for the USA goods.
In his terms he wants to spread democracy; however, this democracy is stained with blood for oil, famine, human massacres, and unjust decisions. Instead of trying to solve the problem by negotiations, Mr. Bush and his cabinet have pictured that the palestinians are the rapist of palestine, the lebanese as terrorist groups and unable to rule themselves, not to mention that the people of Iraq as savages.
If we look at Iraq, Sadam Hussein is a dictator who has been commanded by the USA through KSA in the Iraqi - Irani war. Once the war ended up, he invaded Kuwait with a green light from the USA government. Later on the Iraqi people paid for what the USA and Sadam Hussein have agreed on. the result was famine, diseases, and death.
Later on Mr. Bush came back to picture to relief Iraq form its dictator by his new invasion. To the USA public, Iraqis were going to embrace the USA army which will free them from the tyrant. it was totally different there. No population is going to accept having a tyrant displace another one.
the main reason of the war was Oil, not to mention that Sadam insulted Bush senior ;):P
As for the palestinian cause, Mr. Bush gave a green for Sharon to put the palestinian president under siege. Yasser Arafat was the most cooperactive president when it came to the USA foreign policy. Arafat died but this is not the end of the story.
The USA gave the green light and then turned its back to the invasion of the palestinian cities.
Even when Europian and American activists were killed or iltreated, the american government did not move a hand to stop this. people were used as human armor by the israeli troops. Press rights were smashed against the wall and the USA governement was watching and blessing this war. it was war against terror. the terror was the stone throwers against the third army in the world in terms of arms and experience in war.
it was an F16 against a stone.
last but not least, the war on lebanon. the arms journal, in the USA as i presume, has announced that Israel was planning for an invasion of lebanon in septeember or october 2006. Allegedly, the israelis say the have withdrawn from lebanon; however, Israel still occupies the Shebaa farms and Kfarshouba hills, not to mention four prisoners in the israeli prisons.
More to that, Israel can prosecute any arab or non arab citizen but when Ariel Sharon was to be brought to trial in Brussels, Mr. Bush vetoed this.
In terms of the aggression on lebanon, since 2000, israel invaded the lebanese airfield, killed three peasants, kidnapped and released farmers on lebanese grounds, and still claimed it has withdrawn.
The main reason of the war was not the two soldiers. it was the USA cover of israel. the UN cannot and could not do anything since John Bolton vetoed or threatened to veto any resolution to come out if it is not in Israel's favor.
I cannot go on because it would take pages and pages to give examples on how USA's policy in the Middle East is. Please note that I did not mention Afghanistan or Pakistan or Iran since they are not originally part of the middle east.
2006-08-17 23:27:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by Lebanese 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
He's on the side of evangelistic caplitalists. No, you won't find many in the middle-east!
I don't think the current administration is smart enough to play the two major muslim factions against each other. Hint...hint...
2006-08-17 22:04:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dear Ms bullshit
political motives aside - the humanitarian issues is heart breaking.
i feel deeply for any person who loses his or her life - regardless of their religious/political believes and practices.
you state that the world hates the USA - however keep in mind that the American people do not deserve to be hated - they are citizens of the US and not the Political parties involved in
decision making.
I do not wish to express myself on Bush and his policies. i am however deeply disturbed by what i see on TV.
2006-08-20 07:34:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush is on our side. As for the world hating American then why do they kill themselves to come over here.
2006-08-17 22:30:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
HEY I HAVE TOP GET IN ON THIS,BUSH ISN'T FOR ANYTHING BUT BIG OIL. WE THE PEOPLE NEVER GET THE TRUTH ABOUT ANYTHING ANYMORE IT IS NOTHING BUT LIE'S WE HEAR ANYMORE. WHAT WE NEED IS SOMEONE WHO WILL RUN THIS COUNTY THE WAY IT SHOULD BE AND PUT IT BACK TO WHAT IT ONCE WAS AND STOP TRYING TO TAKE CARE OF ALL THE WORLDS PROBLUMES. IT IS OUR OUN COUNTY HE NEEDS TO WORRY ABOUT NOT OTHER'S. EVERY COUNTY HATES US B/C OF HIM AND HIS BUTT BUDDY'S.
2006-08-17 22:37:55
·
answer #11
·
answered by bear 2
·
0⤊
0⤋