Do you think Karr killed Jon Benet?

Question

opinions please

Answer 1

I think that John is a very mentally il indivual that has sexual perversions,but I think that in his mind he imagined a scenario of being with her & doing many perverted things,over time he has magnified it & in his illness has created this attrocity.If ,as his ex wife & brother state that he was in Alabama,during this period,only in his warped mind can he be justified in stating that he did this.His guilt for past perversions has taken center stage,he wants to be punished so he confesses,it is not uncommon among mentally ill to confess to crimes that were only perpetrated in the mind. He has carefully followed every aspect of the Jon Bonet case & set a scene for himself.When Child molesters/killers are apprehended they shun publicity,deny,deny deny involvement,they will hide their faces from the media,not seek it.He has read/studied & pursued the family of JonBonet & to punish himself for being a deviant has confessed,he wants ,punishment,loathingfrom others as a fit end to a life that he cannot handle.I would be amazed if the blood dna that the police have is a match. Even if they gave him apolygraph he would not pass because he ,in his mind believes it to be true.Yes he is guily of crimes against children,but not of Jon Bonet,he needs to be put away in a locked psychatric facility for his own & others sake. My heart goes out to his 3 young sons,some legacy for them to have to live with,others can be cruel to children,may these boys & the ex wife be spared the shame.

Answer 2

John Karr did not kill Jon Benet. John had seven years to get as a lot information he might want to thus. He might want to have become smitten by it even as it got here out on the info. those who're rowing their boats with one orr will do something they could to be observed. no remember no matter if it truly is adverse or constructive interest. To them it truly is interest from the international reason for it being extreme profile case and the media interest from it. What insane individual doesn't desire that? This John Karr is starving for interest. he's not the form individual to bypass right into a strangers abode and kill a baby. i in my view have self assurance the daddy executed it or knows something. He might want to have become jealous of no longer having a classic spouse and by no skill recieving interest from the spouse and the spouse spending thousands of greenbacks in this newborn and neglecting something else of the relatives. He might want to of snapped. The little lady might want to of talked back to her father and he snapped from years of emotions he had to stay with from his adverse wondering. the daddy knows something. He knows if he does no longer save himself at the same time that his existence is over. he's sturdy. the reality will come out finally...

Answer 3

Well he was in Thailand when he was arrested and confested as I understand it? I am just waiting for find out how the pieces tie together for him. Besides Thailand is hte land where the soceity sells their little girls for sex. And a lot of American perverted sexual offender go there to have sex wiht 5 and 6 year olds. So if he confessed, and he was arrested on other sexual charges with young girls .... why not believe him?

Doyou have a better explaination or do you think is it a conspiricey of the government?

Answer 4

I've always believed that you're innocent until proven guilty.
From what I've read his story has some holes in it.

1.- the used of drugs.
There was no evidence of drugs in her body.

2.-he said he had taken her home from school, and she died during vacation.

3.-His ex-wife said he was with her during that day. Although if they have kids together maybe she's trying to protect him to avoid an scandal for the sake of the children.

4.- he said it was an accident but she had a hit in the head that almost measured a ft.
5.-He said he had intercourse before killing her and there was no semen, or strong enough evidence of vaginal or anal intercourse.

The only way of knowing will be with the dna results.

Answer 5

I don't know, there isn't enough evidence yet. He says he did, but there is no evidence that he was there and people have stated that he was not even in the state at the time.
So who knows. We will find out.
I personally think that he didn't do it, based on the fact that he confessed so quickly when confronted and has shown so much remorse and guilt since. If he was truly feeling that guilty about it he would have stepped forward years ago. I think it is an attention scam.

Answer 6

Well, he said he did...although he said her death was accidental. Not quite sure how garroting a 6 year old girl qualifies as accidental.

But it does raise more questions eg how was he able to do this in the house while both parents were there? Surely there was some noise? Etc...

Answer 7

Unequivocally I would say yes, he killed her. Doesn't he look like one of those child molesters? Look where he was arrested too... In Thailand, where the child sex industry is a big problem. What a sicko!

Answer 8

I think there is a possibility he did it. You can't automatically buy in on his confession because people confess to crimes everyday that they don't really commit. He might just be a sicko and have a fantasy that he did it...who knows? We'll just have to wait until they take him to court and provide the evidence.

Answer 9

No, I think someone close to her killed her. Karr is psychotic and unable to distinguish reality from his sick fantasies.

Answer 10

I don't believe he did it.
I know he confessed--- but people confess all the time
to crimes they do not commit.
I think he is a perv,
and I think he is unbalanced.

honestly....I think he wants to get extradited back
to the U.S. before they behead him. They are not as
conscious as we are about violating someones civil rights.

but, we shall see.