English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

14 answers

hello wat did u say? hez caused harm to israel or israel caused harm to palestine, gaza and now lebanon. israelis have been doing this for past 34 years.

which world do u live in?
and what about the 150 civilian lebaneese women, both pregnant,old, young, who are held captive in underground dungeons of israel.?
and wat about all the people israel has been captivating since past 34years.?
do u know the name of the entire family that was killed at the shoreline of gaza, they were all killed by israeali artillaries.do u even know that.?

the media is hiding things. check out this.
http://news.sky.com/skynews/video/videoplayer/0,,31200-galloway_060806,00.html

2006-08-17 19:48:40 · answer #1 · answered by marissa 5 · 2 1

America can't attack North Korea in a land war. But North Korea is at the brink, and a destruction of its infrastructure would probably mean disaster for it. The risk is nuclear reprisal upon the south, and a damage to US economic and political interests.

Iran is a different matter. Destruction of its oil wells would be the end of te country, but would be the US shotting itself in its collective foot.

The Iraeli experience in Lebanon has only one lesson for us: that Hezbollah (and by extension the Iranians) don't care how many of their cannon fodder are martyred. Or, seemingly, their "civilian" populationl.

However, if either North Korea or Iran tests nuclear weapons, the response of interested parties is totally unpredictable. Armageddon now or later?

2006-08-17 19:46:05 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

No America has too much to loose by attacking North Korea. North Korea has these giant cannons in the mountains somewhere and they can destroy Seoul SOuth Korea in 5 minutes and they can easily attack Japan which has the second best economy in the wo0rld. Iran is more plausible. I don't know about them but I am going to say no because if you attack Iran, North Korea will just get crazier bc of fear.

I don't think Israel really lost that many people. They did but America has lost far more in IRaq. I think it would be a mistake if we attack Iran. I think IRan has tech from NOrth Korea and visa versa and plus IRan is getting RUssian technology. I am KOrean and I think it would be bad if America attacks either country. I think AMerica is angering too many of the moderates in the Middle East like Eygpt and Jordan. I do not know how long they will stay moderate and go against the US.

2006-08-17 19:44:31 · answer #3 · answered by KrazyK784 4 · 3 1

Never trust stats given to the public during war time. They are bound to be... well... let's say "exaggerated".
With regard to North Korea, it is not the US's business or job to attack Nth Korea. If that country chooses that way of life it is up to them to change it WHEN they want to to what they want to. Besides, attacking N.Korea it would be far more dangerous than it was with Vietnam. North Korea has already said that they DO have nuclear weapons and that they will used them if attacked. I personally do not give a toss what political inclination N.Korea may chose to have. I think that the reasons given for preemptive strikes normally are excuses. I also think that we have lost the notion that we should only pick up arms when attacked. Lately we seem to go round the planet bombing everyone we fancy with impunity. That has got to be wrong. And "Marissa" above gave us a great link. Brave Mr. Gallaway !!http://news.sky.com/skynews/video/videoplayer/0,,31200-galloway_060806,00.html

2006-08-18 04:12:39 · answer #4 · answered by RED-CHROME 6 · 0 1

ok seem, the UN despatched inspectors to Irans nuclear centers, and miraculously all secret try sites have been stripped and imploded in one day. So in the event that they have been making capability and not weapons they does not have coated up all their stuff. additionally Iran is a terrorist state (it relatively is a shown certainty seem it up). So in the event that they did make capability they might use the with the aid of-producy into grimy bombs, and who would they supply it to? - the terrorist that they help, practice, and arm. North Korea is an self sufficient state that hates the international and with a nuclear missle they might do loads of injury to Japan, China, Russia, South Korea, and infinite different international locations. Do you even comprehend something approximately North Korea? For the previous 50 years the youngsters in undemanding instructions are taught one subject : the u . s . is the reason you consume airborne dirt and dirt and stay in airborne dirt and dirt. it relatively is genuine seem it up. North Korea makes their infants hate the u . s ., practice them to shoot at american photographs, and tell them that the u . s . has taken over and corrupted South Korea and that sometime they'll unite the Korean Penninsula. So i think of that the two threats are undesirable and that Iran is the worser of the two evils. those are all genuine statements watch the historic previous channel or the invention channels stuff on them or you ought to seem it up on the internet. Ans those costs of Iran and Bush and North Korea are not genuine statements. you are able to no longer make an argument with crappy stuff like that. additionally the reason of the insurgency and terrorism in iraq is as a results of fact the place human beings are the Anti-American extremist will bypass to combat them, so would you somewhat combat them here in us of a of america or in Iraq? many of the insurgents are from international locations in the middle east and that they bypass to Iraq to die scuffling with so as that Allah will reward them in the afterlife with ninety two Virgins. it relatively is genuine.

2016-10-02 05:50:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I have all the sympathies with Lebanonese, Iraqis and Afghanees and all other victims [nations and their people] of Amercia, Israel and U.K. and their allies, In fact Amercia, Israel and U.K. and their alliance in a preplanned manner, attacked Lebanon and this attack on Lebanon was their preparation to attack Iran / North Korea and in fact the Israeil U.S., U. K., and their alliance have succeeded in their cause, by waging war against Lebenon and by getting pass Cease Fire Resolution, in U.N.O., and this Resolution, itself is their great achievement and in this way they have provided protection / security shield to Israel, in the event if they Invade Iran and wage / rage war against, North Korea / Iran.

It is undigestable victory of U.S., Israel, U.K. and their alliance, over weak nations of Africa and other Asian Countries and in this strategy / planning to invade Iran / North Korea, the Israel has suffered historic heavy lives losses.
It is true that Israel has never expected such huge losses

2006-08-17 19:55:30 · answer #6 · answered by mushtaqehind 3 · 1 1

get the nuke ready to fire at this idiot's a.s.s.

US won't attack N. Korea, they have real WMD there! We are not in the habit of attacking countries who can muster a nuclear warhead on the western democracies... paging iran, get a clue...

2006-08-17 19:47:11 · answer #7 · answered by Shangri-La 4 · 1 1

We are not next door to either country. And we wouldn't send in ground troops. I think we have learned from Iraq, and if we are forced to take action... I bet it will be an aerial bombardment which will crush the nations.

2006-08-17 19:44:34 · answer #8 · answered by Jon H 5 · 0 3

Read all of this idiot's questions... you will come to one conclusion:

There is no gray matter between his ears.

2006-08-17 19:43:14 · answer #9 · answered by askthepizzaguy 4 · 3 2

Yes you idiot

and crush them both

2006-08-17 19:42:58 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

fedest.com, questions and answers