English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

20 answers

Hezbollah did not kick Israel out, read the news.

2006-08-17 19:41:13 · answer #1 · answered by surfer2966 4 · 6 0

There you go again...doesn't it get old for you??? Making stupid comments to try and rile people up?? It's been done to death dude. Israel could have kicked the **** out of them if it weren't for the intense pressure from the rest of the world to back off. Hezbollah hides among the innocent, counting on the public outrage when inevitably, the innocent are killed. And yet still, there are people like you, who can't see through this nonsense!! What more could Israel have done?? They warned the civilians the attack was coming. You don't understand what is going on. Wise up! Try learning something insted of spouting off about a subject you know nothing about. Have a nice day.

2006-08-17 19:51:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

I can't speak for all Americans, but I would say largely the perception in America is that Israel was militarily annilating Hezbollah. If the UN hadn't put a stop to the blood letting, I am not entirely sure that Lebannon would have any infrastructure remaining.

I find it amazing how Israel manages year after year to exsist in a sea of nations that continuously call for its destruction, Israel wins every war it fights, and still you think that it was "thrown out" of Lebannon.

2006-08-17 19:49:20 · answer #3 · answered by Natasha 3 · 4 0

If you are a Zionist American Jew you rather misinform the people of the USA with misleading facts. What is going on in the Middle east is because of Israeli refusal to end its occupation according to the UN 242 resolution and Israel want to keep Palestinian and Lebanese and Syrian land that was never part of Israel. The roots of the conflict is Israeli occupation of other people lands and look you are not helping Israel when you lie the whole world know that to solve the Middle East conflict is by ending occupation

2006-08-17 20:19:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

incorrect. They majority of Lebanon tolerate Hezbollah as area of the authorities, formally! They settle for and well known a 17 november of their midst. Sorry, no more effective hiding behind the skirts of us of a states saying, "you won't be able to contact me because this us of a did not attack you, I did! you won't be able to invade because they did not do it." That lasts merely about 5 seconds formerly the invasion comes, now adays. We no longer tolerate the shell recreation. each and every time someone aids in shifting the squaddies, Israel follows the course. in the adventure that they lead them into Lebanon, they bypass into Lebanon. you opt to end this? one way: provide back the squaddies. Then they are going to bypass abode. you ought to appreciate, many Islamic human beings, residing less than dictatorship and consistent propaganda, are very wondered about loose international places. they imagine we are weak and stupid because they have continually been taught that they are more desirable. Then the have something like the attack on Iraq, and their generals are stuck telling the troops how the U.S. and allies have become killed everywhere yet Iraq is prevailing, each and each of the even as Saddam is hiding in a hollow. you won't be able to benefit power and foster lies. Islam will fall, or reform without it is wish for conquest. The Lebanese celebrated in the streets even as 9/11 got here about. we've the video tape, we've the recordings from Islamic stations. we heavily isn't fooled back. both take out the terrorists on your midst, or we can.

2016-11-25 23:41:03 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

If that is how you want to spin it then go ahead. Isreal did ... Miscalculate how long it would take to destroy the mohamaden terrorists but they will just be better prepared next time. We all know Hezbollah is too stupid to keep hidden so it will do something else stupid (like attack the lebanese army or the UN forces) and then Isreal will be called in by Lebanon itself and be free to finish the job.

2006-08-17 19:43:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Thirty three days of war. The longest of our wars since 1949.

On the Israeli side: 154 dead--117 of them soldiers. 3970 rockets launched against us, 37 civilians dead, more than 422 civilians wounded.

On the Lebanese side: about a thousand dead civilians, thousands wounded. An unknown number of Hizbullah fighters dead and wounded.

More than a million refugees on both sides.

So what has been achieved for this terrible price?

"GLOOMY, HUMBLE, despondent," was how the journalist Yossef Werter described Ehud Olmert, a few hours after the cease-fire had come into effect.

Olmert? Humble? Is this the same Olmert we know? The same Olmert who thumped the table and shouted: "No more!" Who said: "After the war, the situation will be completely different than before!" Who promised a "New Middle East" as a result of the war?

THE RESULTS of the war are obvious:

* The prisoners, who served as casus belli (or pretext) for the war, have not been released. They will come back only as a result of an exchange of prisoners, exactly as Hassan Nasrallah proposed before the war.

* Hizbullah has remained as it was. It has not been destroyed, nor disarmed, nor even removed from where it was. Its fighters have proved themselves in battle and have even garnered compliments from Israeli soldiers. Its command and communication stucture has continued to function to the end. Its TV station is still broadcasting.

* Hassan Nasrallah is alive and kicking. Persistent attempts to kill him failed. His prestige is sky-high. Everywhere in the Arab world, from Morocco to Iraq, songs are being composed in his honor and his picture adorns the walls.

* The Lebanese army will be deployed along the border, side by side with a large international force. That is the only material change that has been achieved.

This will not replace Hizbullah. Hizbullah will remain in the area, in every village and town. The Israeli army has not succeeded in removing it from one single village. That was simply impossible without permanently removing the population to which it belongs.

The Lebanese army and the international force cannot and will not confront Hizbullah. Their very presence there depends on Hizbullah's consent. In practice, a kind of co-existence of the three forces will come into being, each one knowing that it has to come to terms with the other two.

2006-08-17 20:41:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

That's a pretty neat trick. Can you explain how a harried, routing, vastly overpowered, outgunned, outflanked, and pulverized ragtag group of militants managed to force the Israeli army out of their lands?

Answer: If the United Nations hadn't forced a ceasefire, Israel would have finally wiped those scumbags from the face of the Earth.

2006-08-17 19:41:52 · answer #8 · answered by askthepizzaguy 4 · 7 0

yeah man, thats cool that your supporting hezbollah, the group that uses human shields. You are sick. Israel could totally wipe out hezbollah with no problem at all. No doubt about that.

2006-08-17 19:42:58 · answer #9 · answered by de rak 4 · 7 0

You moron! Where do get your information? BOTH parties agreed to a UN cease-fire!

I wouldn't start sucking ***** quite yet. You cumstains didn't endure 1/10th of what Israel could have done to you.

Shitheads like you should have been the ones that took a round in the pumpkin.

2006-08-17 19:42:29 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

fedest.com, questions and answers