The Second amendment "A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." seems pretty clear to me. I would like to understand how somthing so obvious, like "bearing arms" is so widely disputed "collective right vs Individual right". Even the wording infringed is obvious to me. Infringed would be a violation of a right. Where is the Supreme Courts stance when considering many notable infringments on an individuals ability to bear arms? Where is a great resource for finding this information in the future....yeah I know about wikipedia already, I need a source that is a little more comprehensive on past rulings, current rulings as well as upcoming rulings.
2006-08-17
18:53:30
·
1 answers
·
asked by
James H
3
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics