Ah. question is pretty self-explanatory. Which do you prefer?
Personally, it'd have to depend on the quality of the book, how well the loose ends were tied, the closure of relationships, etc.
I prefer fanfiction to the actual work most of the time... merely because... the authors must restrain themselves from publishing anything too shocking, so I believe they censor what they write to fit a wider population. True, there are a lot of fanfiction pieces that are just a waste of time to read, but the truly spectacular ones... are sometimes four times better than the original storyline. They don't have to establish the characters, as they are already well-known... they can sometimes bring attention to relationships that the author did not focus much on... they can go beyond what the author had in mind for characterization. They can let us squealing fangirls have what we want but is never given in a book-- the passionate sidestories that the author never includes.
2006-08-17
18:21:59
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Zyxxin
3
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ Books & Authors
I don't know... I just think... well-written fanfiction is more emotional than most published prose.
Ah, but there are some authors that can never be outdone by a fanfiction writer-- such as the works of Teresa Medeiros (historical romance novelist) and Anne Rice (author of the vampire series, and the Beauty series)
Opinions? Please don't answer unless you are aware what fanfiction is, and have read a fair share yourself.
2006-08-17
18:23:59 ·
update #1