Liberals whats your master plan for stopping terrorism?

Question

-Had a rough day and could use a laugh

Answer 1

nuclear weapons, fire bombing

Answer 2

the answers given were:

1)Go after Bin Laden, which is pointless, because we would have to go against the UN to do so and invade pakistan, something the liberals would never do, because they always need UN approval before they wipe the s'hit from their a'ss.

2)warmly embrace the rest of the world who hates us, inviting them into our country without an FBI background check, and trading with human rights abusers and terrorists, thus giving them the financial support and criminal connections needed to plant suitcase nukes all over our nation

3) blame the conservatives for not preventing 12 american cities from being nuked by terrorists that liberals allowed in.

4) cry like a little b'itch and beg the conservative hawks to take over the reins of power, because the liberals don't know how to run a taco stand, let alone the greatest nation on Earth.

Answer 3

What's yours? Kill them all? If it could work then I'd go for it!

I just think that killing terrorists often kills civilians too.. Then the civilian's family becomes terrorists. For every 1 civilan killed a family turns against us.

I'm not saying stop fighting... I'm just saying stress caution. I expect us to fight terrorism. We have to, it's our duty. We're a country that was attacked and is under attack and we have a right and a need to fight back. We just have to be careful and not tak out other countries along the way. Invading Iraq did save the people from Saddam (DUH) but now the country is full of terrorists, the country has almost no border control so a terrorist group could just waltz in. I think if we were gonna go into Iraq we shoulda got Bin Laden and as much of Al Queda as we could first.

That's just my opinion.

Answer 4

ACTUALLY GO AFTER BIN LADEN!!!!
Divert troops from Iraq to Afghanistan by using a time table for Iraqi forces to actually do some fighting or else.

ACTUALLY FIND ALTERNATIVE ENERGY SOURCES!! Bush cut that development in half, of course it's not because he's an oil guy. By using more alternative sources we buy less oil from terrorist country's who support terrorism.

Create a rebellion in Iran. The people there actually like America, and are primed for more freedom.

Use massive amounts of propaganda by any means. Joseph Goebbels would be proud.

Pretty much do the opposite of whatever Bush is doing.

Answer 5

My master plan is to remove the CAUSE of terrorism - mainly people like you. You get my drift? We know that people of your ilk are mentally challenged and therefore have a propensity to stir up trouble with your evil hidden agendas.
We will save your dumb a s s e s (although I'm not sure why)

Answer 6

Gassing Neo Cons?

Answer 7

You'll see when the democrats take over the House in Nov. and then the White House in 2008.

Answer 8

You have to think about what would deter somone from being a suicide bomber, in other words someone who thinks they have nothing to lose and is not afraid, even anxious to die for their cause.

There are several approaches:

We could arrange to kill the entire families of anyone caught as a suicide bomber. In the case of 9/11, that would have meant infiltrating into Saudi Arabia, and murdering hundreds of innocent people. No one has suggested doing that, and I wouldn't suggest it myself, but I think it might have had some effect. If someone knew their entire family would be killed, it might make him think twice before killing himself to find all those virgins in Heaven that he was promised. The Israelis do something like this when they bomb the houses of terrorists, and confiscate their property, but they are accused of over-reacting, and sometimes their actions can create a vicious cycle of violence.

Or we could co-opt these people and get them engaged in the system somehow. That seems to be part of the idea of trying to bring democracy to the Middle East. Liberals and conservatives should support that, but we seem to be doing a pretty bad job of it so far.

Or we could try to kill all the bad guys. That seems to be creating martyrs and breeding more people who want to do us harm, so it doesn't seem to be working too well.

Or we could try to follow the British example in dealing with IRA terrorists. Infiltrate the IRA with spies, so that they don't know who to trust anymore, but at the same time work for a political solution that actually deals with the problems that the IRA terrorists are concerned about. This approach seems to have been fairly successful. Israel of course takes a similar approach to terrorism in being very tough with spying and security, but at the same time working for a political solution. After it proved impossible to make a deal with the Palestinians, Israel decided unilaterally to withdraw from Gaza and is attempting something similar on the West Bank. If we were to contemplate a similar strategy, we might think about doing things like reducing our military presence in Saudi Arabia, which inflames Islamic fundamentalists.

We could do more good old-fashioned police work. Scotland Yard seems to have been effective in stopping the recent plot to blow up planes over the Atlantic.

We could probably do a much better job with security at our ports. Right now I understand it is not too difficult to get a container into this country without being inspected.

We could think about improving the pathetic rail system in this country so that we are not so dependent on air travel.

Or we could do what the Bush administration is doing: Try to incite fear into the American people, and blame everything on the dictator of a country that was not involved in the terrorist acts, then get into a war to distract everyone's attention from the real problems, attack the very civil liberties that are supposed to make us different from them, use incendiary language that even Bush finally admitted was over-heated and counter-productive, and call what we are doing a "war," so that we have actually elevated the status of a weak enemy and given them reasons to justify their actions. We could mismanage the Iraq situation so badly that it seems we are just likely to create another Iran. Meanwhile our presence there seems to serve as a recruiting device for more terrorists.

Just a few random ideas. I wonder what your master plan is.

Answer 9

Uofgleam, Just how multicultural do you think it is in Iran? Syria? Most parts of the middle east?
Just how much do you think they would accept you???

Answer 10

uh... open the 9-11 report... go after the people listed in it...

I know it's a crazy idea...

askthepizzaguy: he killed 3,000 Americans... I know that's not enough to make you go after him... but that's about all the excuse we need... thanks for trying...

Answer 11

Easy. First don't give them a right wing conservative target.

Then don't go and attack nations by making up stuff about them. Use proof.

and finally: MULTICULTURALISM.