2006-08-17 17:18:54 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
It's neither an invasion of privacy nor an unreasonable search.
The reasoning is that you hold your fingerprints out for public inspection with everything you touch. So, if you are going to leave your fingerprints everywhere you go, it can't be an invasion of privacy to leave them on a piece of paper for the police.
2006-08-17 17:23:57 · answer #1 · answered by coragryph 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
In olden days the finger prints of habitual criminals were taken for record.It is considered as a disgraceful act to take someones finger prints.
2006-08-18 00:29:45 · answer #2 · answered by khan a 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is no need to be paranoid about getting your fingerpint taken if you have nothing to hide. It is not an invasion of your rights.
2006-08-18 00:54:50 · answer #3 · answered by Goldenrain 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you have nothing to hide-whats the problem.
If the Police/Security forces want to "obtain" your prints or DNA-they will do.
2006-08-18 00:23:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No? They take it when your first born to keep it on record. Your fingerprint is tied to your identity, not your soical security number or anything.......
2006-08-18 00:23:43 · answer #5 · answered by Stupendous Man! 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hhhhmmmm this is a good question I don't have an answer but I sure will check other replys in time here. again good question!!!
2006-08-18 00:24:14 · answer #6 · answered by DJ SANDMAN 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I guess it might be if they force you to. If you're arrested it's not a violation of rights.
2006-08-18 00:23:58 · answer #7 · answered by Justsyd 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only if you are a criminal!
2006-08-18 00:33:30 · answer #8 · answered by sundevilcajun 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
IT IS YOUR OWN SIGNATURE FOR YOUR OWN GOOD.
2006-08-18 00:24:18 · answer #9 · answered by Bhahagyam 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋