Why do democrats like John Kerry call our service men terrorists?

Question

I distinctly remember this quote from face the nation by John Kerry, "...that young American soldiers need to be going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children, you know, women, breaking sort of the customs..."

Why does Kerry and his voters make statements against the USA and its servicemen like this? I recall that Kerry did this in Vietnam. He's the same communist/fascist loyalist that he has always been. I think Kerry is loyal only to Islamofascists, IMHO.

Kerry is pitiful.
'If you mean dying in the course of the United Nations effort, yes, it is worth that. If you mean dying American troops unilaterally going in with some false presumption that we can affect the outcome, the answer is unequivocally no.'" April '94 Answering Cessno on CNN


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A46225-2004Oct19.html

Why would any democrat call someone ignorant when they can't figure out the difference between "your" and "you're"?

Answer 1

Maybe because Kerry is ashamed of his own service .
1 Remember he would release all his military documents
2 Remember his dd-214 is dated in 1978 hmmmm isn't that after Carter gave amnesty to a lot of vets?
3 Nixon said it best " He went to Vietnam and hawk and came back a dove"
4 Ohh and BTW dont forget he thought terrorism was something best handled by the local police

Hes too busy watching polls and saying what ever trying to buy his way in .

Answer 2

You're asking a loaded unfair question. Kerry personally might say outrageous things but he isn't going to be a presidential candidate again. I believe that the Democratic Party supports our brave service men and service women. They have questions about the war and our reason for having it. Democrats as a group are not unpatriotic. I bet a lot of soldiers in Iraq have family who are Democrats.

I have a question. Why do the elite in American society; Democrat and Republican not have their sons and daughters serving in the middle east? Why don't CEO's have their sons and daughters serving in the middle east?

Think about Israel. A prominant anti war activist in Israel lost one of his sons in Lebanon. His other son served and soon his daughter will be drafted. He doesn't think that war is justified, but is patriotic to his country and willing to accept that his children have a national duty to fullfill.

Hizbollah figured out that Israel cares about its children and will be unwilling to attack if it means that they will suffer their deaths. Hizbollah believes that individuals can find a reward in the next world and if a lot of Lebanese are killed its not a problem. In fact its a good thing politically.

We are going to lose the war in Iraq for two reasons. One is that we are a humane people that try to avoid the death of innocents and that means we will defang our troops. The second is because the people who make the decisions about our policies do not have to worry about the safety of their own children because they are not the ones fighting. When Israelis make a military or policy decision about attacking an objective or not if their decision is to attack than the outcome could be very personal.

Answer 3

They akk are high on weed. Not a single Demo Smurf knows anything about Government.

Remember when Howard Dean took a hit off of that blunt in Iowa.

Yeee Haaaa

Go big Red Go

Answer 4

Maybe he's really just speaking for himself and his OWN past ACTIONS and ATROCITIES...therefore he thinks that is how ALL of our troops must act. Maybe HE was guilty of terrorizing and therefore all of them must be.
I mean, after all, he thought he was the model serviceman during Viet Nam. I remember his quotes about raping and cutting off heads. Did he see this? Did he do nothing? If so, he's complicit. Otherwise, he's a lying sack of dung.
How dare he and his flip-floppers criticize our brave men and women in uniform. Has he learned NOTHING??? He's as bad as those who spit upon our soldiers returning from Nam. Probably worse.

Answer 5

I would agree with you that Kerry was a disastrous choice for the Democrats in the last Pres. Elections. However, the extrapolation in your statement is stretching the rubber a bit far. LoL. Well done.

Answer 6

Because Democrats and John Kerry suck! Who is he for anyway? I think it is totally ignoramous to say what he says. I have no idea why the statements except that he wants to create some turmoil where he thinks he looks good but looks pretty bad to me. Thank God he did not become President and Bush did.

Answer 7

How can you say communist/fascist, your ignorant, the two are polar opposites... Radical liberals are communists, Radical conservatives are fascists. Bush is pitiful, at least Kerry speaks his mind, a very patriotic thing to do, unlike Bush who is just an idiotic puppet.
By the way, Kerry sucks too, but Bush sucks a thousand times more.
They both support the war, which is stupid...

Answer 8

Excuse me Jerk-Off but I can show you where you have done the same thing on this site just because the service man happens to be more liberal than the Ghengis Khan beliefs you subscribe to.

You are quite a work of art.

Answer 9

John Kerry wants to be president and he is trying to appeal to his base. He wants votes - and that's the beginning and end of it.

Answer 10

Hmmm, where in your quote does it say our service men (don't forget Einstein women are over there serving too) are "terrorists"? Maybe you need to see the news reports that recently reported on a bunch of idiots who raped and killed a girl and her family. It is under investigation. Are they "doing their job"? I think not.