Why do so many liberal judges seem to favor child rapists and slap victims in the face with their rulings???

Question

I'm sure it isn't all of them, but some of them are such chronic offenders, they're every bit as complicit as the sex offenders and should be held responsible when they show a pattern of letting pedophile after pedophile out.

coragryph...um...
ever heard of the Lunsford case? There are DOZENS of them...
In my own state we have a LIBERAL judge who made this ruling:
when a child rapist was arrested (after previous convictions of child molestation and let out early), he said to the cops (paraphrased), "what took you so long to find me?"
The judge dimissed the case because his statement "violated his right not to incriminate himself."
The only fight I am trolling for is an uphill battle to protect kids from sick perverts and, now apparently, liberal judges, who value the life of an innocent child less than a proven monster.
Your statement makes me weep for the children of our country. I hope most liberals don't agree with you.

coragryph...
JESSICA Lunsford. As in "Jessica's Law". Little 8 or 9 y/o girl raped, buried alive and murdered by convicted child molester John Couey who was let free countless times. He even warned them he'd do it again.
You really ARE living under a rock. There are COUNTLESS cases like these. 12 y/o Carly Bruscha comes to mind as well. I cannot believe that even you would defend scum such as these. Look it up...you have a computer. You don't need to even know what state if you'd pay attention...they've been all over the news...but to make it simple, I believe these 2 cases were both Florida.

Why I even address someone who would blindly defend child rapists and murderers is beyond me. I pray he doesn't have kids. Apparently, they don't mean a helluva lot to him if he'd defend scum on made-up technicalities.

Answer 1

It is ALL of them.

And they do this because they aren't there to act as a judge, but, instead to promote marxism. They feel that by putting dangerous criminals on the street to victimize as many people as possible, this will create anarchy. And anarchy will tear down our democracy. Somehow that is supposed to result in utopia (marxists are crazy and stupid, as well as evil).

This is a BIG problem and illustrates quite clearly why it is DISASTROUS to vote democrat. Democrats sign on to this agenda, lock stock and barrel....so much so that these days, they don't even bother hiding it anymore. Instead, they are out in the open, goose stepping around with the muslims. This is not hyperbole. Marxsism originated National SOCIALISM (nazism) and the muslims are old allies of these people. And they most certainly ARE goosestepping around like Nazis....shouting quite loudly everything from holocaust denial to final solution to nuclear Armageddon. These are AMERICAN liberals shouting "Death to America", "Death ti Israel" and giving standing ovations to people like Ward Churchill. Where these people are coming from could not be more perfectly crystal clear.

The thing to understand is they are not harmless fruitcakes. They are heinously evil, well funded, and clearly have plans to hurt people.

They are able to get their people into political office, on the bench, in the schools and basically cause havoc anywhere and everywhere.

Putting pedophiles on the street is only the barest tip of the iceburg.

http://www.discoverthenetwork.com

Answer 2

Do you have any rational objective statistics, or better yet actual caselaw, to back up your arguments?

{EDIT} No, I'm not familiar with the Lunsford case. What state and year? I'll look it up. And you claim there are dozens. Did they all hinge on the same legal issues, or is their similarity just that you didn't like the results.

Generally, the point you made is that the judge let the criminal go because the evidence was obtained in an unconstitutional manner. That's the way it's supposed to work. If you don't like the laws, change them. But the current laws say that if police violate constitutional rights, they cannot use that evidence in the trial (absent a few exceptions). I'm willing to bet, when/if I actually read the case, it wasn't dismissed. It was just that the prosecutor couldn't make the case without the pseudo-confession. Which is not the judge's fault for enforcing the existing rules.

Either we're a nation of laws and we follow them, or we're not. You seem to want to ignore the laws any time the government, or the majority of the media-fed masses, thinks someone is guilty. But if we go that route, we're no better than the tyrannies we're trying to overthrow.

Answer 3

Many people seem to be missing the point here. They aren't favoring child rapists. It isn't that the judges , liberal or conservative, have some sort of special need to let these people go. They are there to interpret the law and hand down judgments which conform to the current statutes and laws. Police and prosecutors know what they have to do to bring someone up on charges and should follow the protocol of that job. And when dealing with these sorts of despicable people, they better make doubly sure they do it right.
Sure, there are judges who step over the bounds, but most of them do a good job. I agree there are too many pedophiles, therefore there should be harsher penalties for the judges to enforce.

Answer 4

I believe until we really get tougher on crimes against children, this is going to continue to hapen. I believe convicted sex offenders deserve nothing more than a swift trip to the gas chamber or lethal injection.

Answer 5

Not really sure that the evidence supports this claim. I would like to believe that doesn't happen on a regular basis.

This is the sort of claim that really needs some supporting evidence. We can't always go on our gut feel about a subject, because we might be wrong.

Answer 6

These judges sometimes ignore the minimum sentencing required of them to assess the criminal. They are breaking the law and still remain on the bench. That's the lib part of it.

Answer 7

The keyword "liberal" in your question answers this question in my opinion. Liberals always want to save people who cannot be saved and blame society for criminal's wrong doings when accountability should be what judges look at. Everyone needs to be held accountable for their negligent actions and this would curb many crimes that take place simply because criminals know how easy they can get off. All they have to do is watch the news.

Drew
http://www.drewsnewsroom.com

Answer 8

Because the Liberals think that the victims in these cases are the pedophiles and not the kids. I don't understand their rationale. I often wonder if it was their kid wouold they feel differently about it.

Answer 9

Simply because they are on a power trip. When they put the black robe on, they apparently leave their common sense in the chambers. And for proof, I offer the fact that they, along with greedy defense attorneys, are among the biggest opponents of mandatory sentences.

Answer 10

i strongly feel the same way. Maybe we should put these judges and juries in jail for erroneous decisions. and for habitual or career criminals of heinous crimes should get the maximum sentence. they should bring back and implement the death penalty. even if they say it's not a deterrent for commision of violent crimes. It wouldn't hurt.