2006-08-17 15:14:24 · 12 answers · asked by Jeff C 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Think I'll sit on that one.
2006-08-17 15:18:42 · answer #1 · answered by DC 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You might look up the 50 or so definitions for the word "take" before letting the world know your state of illiteracy.
2006-08-17 15:37:06 · answer #2 · answered by eagleperch 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i for my section have not got self assurance in God. a minimum of no longer as Christians wish i visit. yet once I did, i might say this to you: possibly, John Lennon had replaced sufficient lives and made a protracted-lasting legacy. He had finished his undertaking, so which you could communicate. you nevertheless ought to take action.
2016-12-11 10:42:32 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ahhh…the intricacies of the English language. In this case it is better to give a bit than to take it from anyone.
2006-08-21 08:29:52 · answer #4 · answered by Maddog Salamander 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because when you dump, you leave it behind...whats the problem? you dump you **** on the side of the road
2006-08-17 16:27:19 · answer #5 · answered by rachel k 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have the same thought every time I hear that one do u know about dagoes?
2006-08-17 15:21:42 · answer #6 · answered by lexi 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No it's leaving one's behind! it' the apostophe, just like zappa said!!!
2006-08-17 15:22:21 · answer #7 · answered by Michael S 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow! That's really profound. I never thought about it that way. :))
2006-08-17 15:22:46 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
that's a good one!
2006-08-17 15:20:56 · answer #9 · answered by a b 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
GEORGE CARLINS LINE
2006-08-17 16:05:53 · answer #10 · answered by flowerspirit2000 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋