The same goes for Jessica Alba.
They are going to have to pay them and then lose money on the movie if they do make a movie, so wouldn't it be cheaper to just lose money on them and then not on the movie also.
And, regardless of money, it would be so much better all the way around if they just quit making movies.
I can think of a few other big names that could use this advice also.
2006-08-17 15:08:24 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
Like Melanie Griffith, Stallone, Segal AND a host of others! lol
2006-08-17 15:15:31 · answer #1 · answered by Skeff 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's just like John Travolta.
He did Grease and Saturday Night Fever or whatever back in the day and they were huge hits. But then he started doing some really crappy movies and he pretty much disappeared.
Tarantino brought him back for Pulp Fiction and completely resuscittated his career, and people began saying what a great actor he was.
Truth is, he was always a pretty decent actor.
2006-08-18 00:35:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't mind Sharon Stone that much, Jessica Alba should go back into the hole she came out of.
Forget Sharon's acting abilities man, Basic Instinct alone will make her immortal.
2006-08-17 22:15:10 · answer #3 · answered by hfmgr06 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It really doesn't work that way. If you really want some one to stop acting, you gotta stop paying them. We can't blame Sharon Stone for milking the studios for their money, after all "a fool and his money", yada yada yada.
2006-08-17 22:15:50 · answer #4 · answered by KenlKoff 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's not about making the movies ...it's about choosing the roles.
I agree about Sharon Stone , but I really think she had potential.
ie: Casino...She was really outstanding in that movie. Before and after that...nuthin' but crap.
2006-08-17 23:12:05 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋