A court today ruled that the Bush regime is againa cting beyond the law... conservatives support outlaws?

Question

It was never the intent of the Framers to give the President such unfettered control, particularly where his actions blatantly disregard the parameters clearly enumerated in the Bill of Rights.

Answer 1

I said this in another answer and was told I was wrong that it didn't happen that no judge would do that,I'm glad I'm not the only one watching the news.....I just hope it stands up the judge from Detroit has a very liberal reputation,but I'm very proud of his ruling.

Answer 2

Yes. The court recognized, as the Supreme Court has said several times now, that nobody, not even the President, can simply ignore federal laws just because they don't want to be bothered with following them.

{EDIT to doolittlerd77} I'm sorry. Which Constitution are you reading. Because the word "God" is not in the one that the US follows. I can't find a single use of that word once in either the original text or any amendment.

The closest I can find, aside from the 1st Amendment, is the part in Article VI that says "no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States. "

Answer 3

Well, we could all be gun control, pro abortion, gay and lesbian marriage, no God in schools or any other public place, anti-death penalty loving left wing liberal idiots.

Or we could be conservatives and believe that only criminals will have guns when we outlaw them, believe in the sanctity of the marriage between one man and one woman, know that we live by the grace of God and no matter how hard you try you can't remove Him, believe in the right to life of an unborn child and that the penalty for a murdering child molester should be death.

Isn't it funny how all you bleeding heart liberals think pro choice and your right to kill an unborn child is your "RIGHT" and yet you can go to prison for destroying an Eagle's egg because it is on the endangered species list? How pathetic is that? But, you honestly think the framers meant that to be your right don't you. Even though God is reference over 30 times in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. Get a life and wake up.

Answer 4

Please, what in the Bill of Rights are you talking about? There was no entry into the premises of the 'tapped' calls. The were intercepted during transmission between the ground and satellites. That's in outer space.

The ruling of one Carter appointed and Clinton promoted judge is not the end of this process.

Answer 5

I blame Bill Clinton for this. If he had just told the court that it was none of their business that two consenting adults had sex or not, none of this would have happened. He could have campaigned harder for Al Gore and even the crooked state of Fla. would not have made any difference. But can you imagine what is going through the minds of these people that still support George Bush. They will blame everything from activist judges to the drive by media. None of them will accept the truth that they voted for a coke snorting, alcoholic with no morals.

Answer 6

Actually, the courts have already ruled many times that his actions were legal under Article 2 of the constitution and this decision will probably (probably) be overturned in the 6th Circuit.

Answer 7

Hmm, the entire government has been overstepping the boundarys of the law when they decided to socialize everything, and look at the swell education system that brought us.

Answer 8

Conservatives supporting outlaws wouldn't be a change.
Think Iran-Contra affair...

No doubt there are a number of others that just never hit headlines as big as that.

Answer 9

Will you eat your words when this ruling is overturned ?? Or maybe leave the country ?? I'll pay for the ticket as far as Cuba !!!

Answer 10

Yes, it is a fact that Republicans and conservatives have no problem taking all of your rights in the name of something or other.