Before they can run.
2006-08-17 13:00:28 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Stupid questions get the best answers.
2006-08-17 13:07:45 · update #1
It makes sense to those that attain its deeper meaning.
2006-08-17 13:11:56 · update #2
No since you have to be rich just to run anyway, Rich lawyer sueing insurance companies, or rich from the Business, or rich from inheriting money, but there is no poor people in national polictical areas.
And honestly a TV star is as in touch with people as a billionare from MN or TX is anyway.
I think that no one could run if their net worth is over 500,000, we may get some real people in power for a change
2006-08-17 13:14:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No need. All their sexual experience will become public knowledge and they'll have no privacy even after they return to private life.
Even in dictatorships the politicians are put under a microscope. Mao Tse Tung had more gay boys around him than Michael Jackson, and his absolute tyranny didn't cover that up.
So I say let celebrities enter politics -- I need a laugh.
2006-08-17 13:06:07 · answer #2 · answered by urbancoyote 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think of the persons reporting the information have long previous too some distance. They act like they are celebrities, i do no longer even care what their call is. stop giggling and making up your person stupid jokes and who supplies a sh$t what your opinion is? checklist the information and that's it. i do no longer care what they appear like the two, i will wager hannity gets up at AM just to start spraying and teasing his hair till ultimately each and every hair is in place and cemented. Joe Scareborrow thinks he's the best dude when you consider that Elvis or something. checklist and close, no person cares pertaining to to the messenger!
2016-10-02 05:27:03 · answer #3 · answered by devnew 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That is retarded. If you do that, then you should probably do that to a great many of get into politics. You think there are any middle-class or poor guys that are in congress?
I'm not crazy about celebs but your question is stupid.
2006-08-17 13:06:32 · answer #4 · answered by dapixelator 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Castration! What happen to castration? We can give them a choice, either loose all your belongings or be castrated. I'm convinced that most of them would choose the latter, especially the girls.
2006-08-17 13:19:39 · answer #5 · answered by briang731/ bvincent 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not me, When celebrities don't have a script in front of them, they are found out rather quickly. They pretty much can burn themselves.
2006-08-17 13:08:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Does that include Ronald Reagan?
2006-08-17 13:08:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Even though I think you are a giant tool I do have to agree with you on this one. To hell with Bono, and Clooney.
2006-08-18 11:22:31 · answer #8 · answered by Death 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It could have prevented Californians from our current "Governor Arnold."
2006-08-17 13:09:57 · answer #9 · answered by HisChamp1 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i kinda do, because these celebrities just ruin our government, they don't know how to rule for crap!!! i should know, i live in KAILIFO-NIA
2006-08-17 13:05:46 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋