1) George Bush
2) Hassan Nasrallah(spelling??)
3) Olmert(isrealie president)
2006-08-17 12:46:27 · 19 answers · asked by julean33 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Hassan Nasrallah
I picked him because all those mother ******* are bad, he is a bad as.s too
because he is a true fighter for his home land, and he gave those powerful one something to think about and a run for it too ( in term of fighting to the top guns).
He really work for his people, nobody is doing the rebuilding, pay people for one year, and money for furniture there. the government there who is a friend to the USA , and he putting them to SHAME because the USA won't do sh.it for them after giving Israel the bombs to bomb the shi.t out of them
I can't never accept a real religious person as my president!!
2006-08-17 12:50:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
President George W. Bush!
2006-08-17 13:06:36 · answer #2 · answered by Katz 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Olmert... it's too bad the international community reigned Israel in, they should have let them just finish this situation once and for all... I can foresee this will remain a problem forever... or until someone just finally ends it already, and hopefully it will NOT end with the annilhilation of the Jewish people.
2006-08-17 12:53:08 · answer #3 · answered by Stephanie S 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of your choices - Olmert ...
Otherwise, there are better choices. Villaragosa (the mayor of Los Angeles) might make an exceptional president.
2006-08-17 12:52:08 · answer #4 · answered by kentata 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I gotta say Olmert, at least the guy has a pair of coconuts
2006-08-17 12:52:31 · answer #5 · answered by JellyCat 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Unfortunately, the only one who's eligible is already President.
The Prez has to be a native-born American, which is why - short of a constitutional amendment - you'll never see President Arnold Schwarzenegger.
2006-08-17 12:54:31 · answer #6 · answered by mommadillo 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
G Gordon Liddy
2006-08-17 12:53:49 · answer #7 · answered by W E J 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
None of the above. I for one think Beavis would do a better job. At least we would all have plenty of TP for our bungholes.
2006-08-17 12:56:34 · answer #8 · answered by Trick69 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
someone has to obfuscate reality......we are fighting terrorists in Iraq....."insurgents" means people who want to kill us for our freedom and blasphemy of Allah....we have to fight them...either here or there....they have been gaining momentum for years...apparently we suck for maintaining a society where someone can gain an education and earn a living, buy a residence, get married, have kids, (and a dog), come home safely, have a beer, safe sex with a spouse, barbeque burgers, etc.......for that, we are infidels...we don't worship Allah.....we must die for our insolence!!!! live and let live isn't enough for them......
2006-08-17 13:08:04 · answer #9 · answered by scott n 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who's the second one?
2006-08-17 12:50:35 · answer #10 · answered by let the speakers blow your mind 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋