Or that John Karr, was only a guy obsessed with her and the case. I read an article on netscape that says that he was obsessed with her case, wrote a paper on her while in college and even interviewed the grandparents. He has two different motives. One from his brother stating he was there the christmas she was killed and one from his wife saying that he was with her the whole time..
Either he is obsessed with her murder, or he done it. Whats your opinion? Please Explain why you think he is innocent or guilty.
2006-08-17 12:45:14 · 18 answers · asked by hearts_bleed_dark 3 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
I have no idea but I am waiting for some evidence to prove that he did it if he can not come up with some real answers it means that he is just a obsessed maniac and nothing else. besides everyone wants to pin the murder on someone he could be the perfect patsy. If he can not give some real pointers about the murder and after the murder it is best forgotten that he ever confessed. Besides there is DNA which can imply or vindicate him. I am keenly following the case with renewed interest.
2006-08-17 12:55:09 · answer #1 · answered by imhm2004 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
First of all, those would be alibis, not motives.
I just read an article that said a former classmate of Karr's had a yearbook signed by him:
"In the 1982 yearbook, Karr ended his missive with the line, "Though, deep in the future, maybe I shall be the conqueror and live in multiple peace," raising the question of whether S.B.T.C means "shall be the conqueror."
(S.B.T.C. was how the ransom note was signed)
It also said that the first letter of each word in the phrase was capitalized. I found the whole thing to be VERY interesting! I mean yes, it could just be pure coincidence, but come on, that would just be too remarkable a coincidence, wouldn't it?
As for the alibis, from what I understand, the family doesn't even remember for sure if he was there. They have to check their photo albums, they said!! Close family, huh?
I really do think it's still possible he could very well be guilty. We'll just have to wait and see. Hopefully this doesn't drag on ten more years!
2006-08-18 19:42:16 · answer #2 · answered by blueEyes 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i have not considered any of the actually info, and that i don't think of any human beings on right here might want to have had a lot get admission to to it, both. So, i don't think of any human beings can recognize the entire tale except he's truly convicted, or perhaps then, there is likely numerous stuff that the well-known public will by no skill study. That aside, inspite of the undeniable fact that, i doesn't be shocked both way. The case remains somewhat a lot up in the air, or perhaps as it grow to be presented that they had a suspect, i grow to be truthfully shocked that they idea that they had adequate info adversarial to someone to arrest them. i grow to be less than the distinctive impact that a lot of what that they had were rendered unusable because of an infection of the crime scene. i go off of Karr's Wikipedia web page, right here, that could want to or gained't be doubtful, yet I assemble that the info they have adversarial to him is really circumstantial, which, even as no longer precisely suspect, isn't precisely damning, both. So, i really do no longer recognize. what's certain, inspite of the undeniable fact that, is that he's an complete weirdo, and that i really do not imagine he might want to be on the line, no matter if he killed JonBenet. It sounds like he's executed an rather good type of harm elsewhere.
2016-11-25 23:13:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
John Karr isn't even from Colorado, he's from Atlanta.
What he followed the Ramseys that Christmas all the way down to Colorado, broke into a house he was unfamiliar with, in a town he didn't know, all the while preventing it from seeming like a break-in, drugged and raped JonBenet while her parents were sleep, killed her by accident and hid her in a part of the house hidden to most except for those who lived there.
You know, saying that he was psycho and therefore has super powers just sounds like you've been watching too many psychological thrillers to me. This scenario just doesn't add up and until this can be explained I simple don't believe it.
I'm glad he's caught and should fry because just looking at him terrifies the sh*t out of me. (Interesting photos of him being published, adds to the push for his guilt in this case)
2006-08-17 13:53:38 · answer #4 · answered by tolula 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I can only say this....If he has offered information that only detectives knew regarding specific information about this case that alone should prove he either committed the brutal slaying of JonBenet or knows more about who did commit this horrific crime. With all the new DNA improvements and with John Karr in custody it's going to be very easy to take samples of his DNA and match it to that found under JonBenets fingernails and underwear. With those test alone if that doesn't prove he did it, then I'd say he knows something about who did, maybe was even an accomplice, or just plain and simple isn't the killer, but defiantly knows something.
2006-08-17 12:59:48 · answer #5 · answered by Marisa Lizette 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This case still seems as phony as the O.J. Simpson case.
Listening to that D.A. talking today, and posturing as if it were a graduation ceremony, was downright pathetic!
This is about a young person who was abducted and murdered, and somebody should be responsible and face the consequences of doing this deed.
And all I keep getting is posturing.
The father takes this calm approach and says don't rush to judgement.
The person who admitted to it is being given all kinds of assistance legally, and nothing is being said one way of the other.
Next thing you'll see is a band of lawyers by his side, and the same old litany of how he was molested as a child.
Yet, a beautiful child was probably brutally tortured and murdered, and that could have been any one of ours' child, and everyone is so calm about this that it tells me the entire system stinks!
I have no faith whatsoever in the judicial system in America.
Innocent or guilty?
The whole damn system is guilty for failing that one child!
2006-08-17 13:18:20 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think he is so obsessed with the case that he made himself believe that he killed her. He has become delusional if you will. My reasons are...
1. he has a alibi saying that he was in a different state at the time of the killing
2. he said he had sex with her it's not believed she was penetrated by a person because no DNA was found, but by something wood possibly the handle of a paintbrush seeing as they did find splinters.
3 he said he drugged her, no drugs where found in her system.
2006-08-19 07:31:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe it is both, he dealt with his guilt by obsessing about the case. It is not uncommon, it is just a different kind of obsession really. Also look where he was picked up Thailand is the pedophile capital of the world.
2006-08-17 12:53:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He was obsessed with her. He LOVED her. He tried to find out as much information on her as he could.
But he is a psycho.
He says that he drugged her, and that he sexually assaulted her.
but we know that isn't true. And his ex-wife says he was in a different state at the time of the murder.
I suspect that he has fantasies of drugging and sexually assaulting her, this is what plays out in his world. And it was his chance to bring his world to the real world. I think this was his one way of making his dreams a reality.
2006-08-17 13:34:14 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think he is taking the rap for somebody eles, he knew too much details of what happen to the body, but there are too many holes in his story, someone spoon fed him the information and the nut job is taking the rap for him
2006-08-19 15:30:11 · answer #10 · answered by MYRAJEAN 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋