It's back and forth. If you take the time to read both sides, then the arguments against all the evidence, then the arguments agains the arguments etc etc.... Right now the conspiracy theories involving our government make more sense than the conspiracy theory our government gave to us.
19 people with box cutters in some kind of angry attempt to hurt America.
Or people in our own government who stand to make huge amounts of money, take away civil liberties and thus gain more power, and an all around raping of the constitution.
For ever argument trying to debunk a conspiracy theory, there is an argument debunking the debunking, save for that stuff about the U.F.O's (such as the sci-fi clip that has been thought true even on you-tube.). The U.F.O ones are pretty much debunked as birds.
But the way the tower collapsed, the speed at which WTC7 collapsed, the shoots of smoke, the smoke surrounding the city, prognostic flow as they call it in the conspiracy vids. ETC ETC...
I mean, any one of these, sure it could just be random chance.
But here look at it like this.
1.The only 3 steel buildings to collapse by fire in history all collapsed on 9/11 2001.
2. There are obvious poofs of smoke coming out of both of the WTC's sides as it is collapsing.
3. The fireman heard explosions inside the WTC after the initial crash.
4. Video evidence collaborates this (Even though technically the shaking of the camera could be an unsteady hand, but the rest of the film doesn't support that.)
5. WTC 7 collapsed evenly and quickly, even though it was damaged on one side, and only by falling rubble. Where as the other towers were designed to be hit by a plane (Not of the size that hit them mind you.) But the WTC7 can't take some rubble hitting it, then starting a fire that somehow causes it to collapse.
6.There are Bin laden- Bush connections.
7. George bush is an oil man, as is his vice president. Conflict of interest if you ask me.
8. The rubble from 9/11 didn't have time to be looked at or investigated. It was sold for scrap. This is a blatant destruction of evidence.
9. The people who were warned not to fly or go to work, for security reasons.
10. Osama bin laden denied having anything to do with 9/11 on a tape that aired before the one Americans all saw on the news.
11. The American tape has had critics tear it apart, such as "osama" wearing a watch and a gold ring, both forbidden by Islamic law. He doesn't look much like osama bin laden nor act like him as in other tapes.
12. The government still has not released the I-315 highway camera that would of seen flight 77 hit the pentagon. Nor have they released the tape from the gas station. How could these be national security?
13. Oddly, tower 2 collapsed first, even though the plane scored an indirect hit, and most of the fuel burned on impact, outside of the building.
14. The black boxes were not found, yet passports, made out of paper were recovered near ground zero, apparently unscathed.
Box designed specifically for crashes and high temperature-gone.
Paper id-Found. Hmmm
15. The record put options...
These are all the ones I can remember off the top of my head.
Now, any single one of these, yeah, sure they can be debunked to some degree, and it wouldn't be a big deal. But when you have this many things sticking out, you have a problem.
The chances of all of this happening like they say it did, and in the amount of time that it happened....about as likely as big foot smoking a blunt with some martians.
However the way the conspiracy theorists are saying it, it is far more likely. Along the lines of the chance that our president drinks alcohol.
2006-08-17 13:04:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by cat_Rett_98 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
I've seen it already. It's interesting and should lead to a real investigation but I'd hardly call it proven just yet...
2006-08-17 18:56:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
wow the damnocrats have made a cute little video to support their lies aka conspiracy theory. The damnocrats are getting smarter everyday making videos and such WOW
2006-08-17 19:02:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Look at this http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html?page=4&c=y
dubunks most of that conspicery theory stuff. Or here http://www.ccdominoes.com/lc/lcg2.html#Engine%20rotor%20mystery? for a detailed debunking of one of them
2006-08-17 19:13:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by lordkelvin 7
·
0⤊
0⤋