English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-08-17 11:29:09 · 11 answers · asked by aggies_2011 2 in News & Events Current Events

11 answers

That is what HE SAID. So I think so.

2006-08-17 11:34:30 · answer #1 · answered by Twisted Maggie 6 · 0 0

Hmmm, he is said to have confessed (always a good sign...), but I don't think he did it. His statements seem rather grandeur and, maybe just a slight bit, well... delusional. They also seem quite contradictory in respect to case details and even other comments that he had previously made.

His ex-wife did say that he was living with her in Alabama at the time, and she made comments that seemed to suggest that he had been quite engrossed (obsessed, even?) with the case and with another case involving a kidnapping-gone-wrong (I think, could be wrong about the details of the other case, definitely involving another little girl, however...). This seems to suggest that he may have held a possible morbid fascination with cases of this nature, and this could have led to the internalization of the JonBenet case after some traumatic (?) experience within his life.

He was said to have emailed some professor in Colarado (?) in the lead up to his arrest, in which he supposedly divulged details of the event that were not otherwise released. This was supposedly a key point in determining his guilt. Honestly, the details of the case have been repeatedly splashed across virtually every form of media avenue available, all over the WORLD. Hell, I could probably join a few dots here and there and make up a plausible (enough) story to convince everyone that I was the true killer!

The biggest sticking points for me, however, was due to the inconsistencies in everything. True, this is probably as much fault of the investigators who did a woeful job with the investigation, and have probably lost and bungled innumerous facts and details of the case. There is of course the inconsistencies with the rape report/details (ie. semen found, then not found...who knows?!) and the question about DNA that no-one seems to have answered (makes me wary...), and I'm sure there are more prime examples that I cannot immediately think about off the top of my head...

Karr did repeatedly say that he loved JonBenet, and that seemed to be the biggest message he was trying to get across when he was arrested. His actions do not speak of a man who loved someone though (even if this man is severely mentally unstable). It does not make sense that he would have tried to kidnap her, it would make more sense if he had tried to 'rescue' her or had simply tried to see her and express his love etc. etc. Kidnapping seems much to premeditated and aggressive for someone who supposedly felt such love toward the victim. This is what truly spoke to me.

I, of course, could be totally TOTALLY wrong, and chances are we will never find out the truth anyway. I predict that they will jump on Karr's confession and have him tried, convicted and locked up before anyone even has a chance to raise any objection to the legitimacy of his confession/ mental state etc. etc!!

2006-08-17 12:00:31 · answer #2 · answered by Lucy Goosey 3 · 0 0

HECK NO! He's just a kook looking for attention. Karr's description of the case as an accident rings false to many crime experts, as it's quite difficult to imagine a more intentional, deliberate murder than hitting a little girl in the head so hard that she had almost a foot-long fracture in her skull and then deliberately fashioning a garrotte to twist until it buries in her neck and slowly stops her breathing. According to detectives and law enforcement personnel connected with the crime, the Ramsey killing has always been a case of deliberate murder and not an accident. Did Karr do it? NOT!

2006-08-17 18:06:06 · answer #3 · answered by lucky 2 · 0 0

I even have examine the ransom notice, some situations now. Has all people observed the wording? they start off with we like your small business company Mr. Ramsey, yet we do unlike your us of a, and what it stands for. Then it is going on and talks approximately, do as we are saying or we are able to behead her! atypical isn't it? the place have we heard that before?? John Karr keeps announcing he did'nt mean to kill her, possibly he did no longer kill her with the aid of his hands, yet he's time-honored with who did, and he had something to do with it. He became into purely delivered returned from a foriengn us of a. How do all of us comprehend he's not from some team, and he knew how they might get some money, and it went all incorrect, and that they had to kill her! purely an obsevation!

2016-10-02 05:22:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

They actually are NOW questioning his confession!! They're saying he's a fake and that he just wants attention. They even said they don't have any solid evidence just his word. He's a sicko!!!! I've been following this story for a long time. When i first seen the movie on lifetime i had to know what was going on. I seen actual photos from the autopsy. They showed everything. That man didn't kill that child. Patsy was involved one way or another.

2006-08-17 12:02:07 · answer #5 · answered by shawn_0523 2 · 0 0

I need a lot more information on the case and all... His name never came up As, I recall.... Now out of the blue we got got the killer...After they put the Ramsey's Thur hell...Sure don't add up... Thanks <:3 }~

2006-08-17 11:37:58 · answer #6 · answered by pitterpatter47 5 · 0 0

hard to say right now. Need to know what kind of evidence they have. What I want to know is if he confessed before, or after U.S. officials got involved?

2006-08-17 11:42:03 · answer #7 · answered by BRITCOURT 3 · 0 0

i think he has realized how boring his Beaver Cleaver life is, and just wants attention. i mean good lord- look at his clothes,the waist of his pants is almost up to his chest hair. he is a wanna be-- too bad he might be though.

2006-08-17 11:36:47 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If I revealed all I know the world would come to an end...

2006-08-17 11:34:28 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't think so, his ex-wife said that he was with her at the time, in Alabama or georgia

2006-08-17 11:34:22 · answer #10 · answered by martin 4 · 0 0

i dont know but i just saw on the news that they have charged him and that he had confessed so maybe he did

2006-08-17 11:35:15 · answer #11 · answered by fear_fox 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers