I dont get that. i think it is very stupid.
2006-08-17 11:17:50 · 23 answers · asked by Shea Butta 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
sailors used to have tatoos + it was only men. n now it's mostly rockers and biker gangs. guys that try to be seen as tough.
2006-08-17 11:25:51 · answer #1 · answered by blue skies 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Times have changed and tattoos on women are becoming more accepted but that wasn't the case 20 yrs ago...women were often shunned and were portrayed to be trashy, slutty and unrespectable for marking their bodies, which was thought to be something only men could do. I think finally, society is starting to accept tattoos as an art with diversified cultural background and meaning. Besides, only women can have a "sexy" tattoo- I think the whole thing is silly and I don't know why people are so critical of what others choose to do with their bodies. There are millions of women who have tattoos and are very lady-like. Good question... now I'm all riled up...
2006-08-17 18:52:10 · answer #2 · answered by Some Chick 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
People Think That It Dosen't Look Right For Women To Have "Markings" Like That On Them, Saying That It's Only For Men n All. But Yeah I Think It's Stupid Too But I Don't Care What They Say I'm Getting At Least 6
2006-08-17 18:25:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I've never heard of that. But I do notice chicks have more girly tats. Not me I have an armband with my b/f's name in Japanese and a tribal sun with a moon inside on the back of my neck, oh, and also a f_u_c_k you tattoo written in chopstick on my lower back. I have always heard that they were sexy.
2006-08-17 18:27:14 · answer #4 · answered by lilblu 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't think it is at all. I have a tribal tat on my lower back and I get lots of compliments on it. I don't think women should be covered in em though.... I've seen that and I think it just looks bad but that's just my opinion.. It's their body, not mine.
2006-08-17 18:33:19 · answer #5 · answered by Shannon™ 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It depends on where it is and what it is....mine is on my right shoulder and it's a rose. When I got it 20 years ago I did it to be different from most girls but nowadays so many females have them.
2006-08-19 18:13:35 · answer #6 · answered by Dellajoy 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's definitely not cool for women to were any type of tatoos because they always put them in inappropiate places and love to be exposed showing them. Only on certain guys is good too depends how they use it. It's for soldiers and the tough ones to me.The ones that fight at war. Battle!!
2006-08-17 18:45:14 · answer #7 · answered by dismaomay 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
well. i think it depends on what the tattoo is and where it is lodcated. i dont think girls should get them on their lower arms or nothin. i think lower back upper back (owww) and ankle would be the best places cause its more lady like.its not kool for a lady to wear a dress or something and her have big dark tatoos al over her. not very "Pretty" No offense to you that do have them though. they are prob. very pretty on you***. ; )
Kezrah
2006-08-17 18:32:26 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I DON'T THINK IT'S UNLADY LIKE I THINK IT DEPENDS ON THE TATOO. THERE ARE SOME REALLY FEMINE ONES OUT
THERE AND IT ALL DEPENDS ON WHERE YOU GET IT PUT
ON YOU. THE SHOULDERS ,THE SMALL OF YOUR BACK,OR YOUR ANKLE CAN BE VERY FEMINE
2006-08-17 18:29:40 · answer #9 · answered by vampire lover 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't think it is at all, I have 2 and I am very ladylike. In fact, given they are in the right place, I think they are very feminine. Tattoos are awesome!
2006-08-17 18:23:45 · answer #10 · answered by chelle 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't know if it's unladylike, but it can sure be ugly. I kind of like small tattoos here or there, but when they do their entire arm or their back or half their leg---it's just plain hideous. The drawings and coloring are usually quite grotesque.
It's a good way to ruin the look of your skin.
2006-08-17 18:24:05 · answer #11 · answered by Ox Cimarron 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋