Was the Boston tea party an act of terrorism we all embrace?

Answer 1

This is interesting because it was only tea but it was a different era too. I would say that if someone blow up some empty fighter planes that would be terrorism even though they aren't killing anybody, or even a power tower would be terrorism. I wasn't alive in that era so I don't know if tea was that important to cause terror and I don't think I'll read of it either unless is a British version. So my opinion is inconclusive with the information available.

Answer 2

The American Revolutionary War was an act of terrorism we all embrace, as was the Boston Tea Party.

Answer 3

I wouldn't exactly call a threat to tea an act of terror. Nobody was killed, just a lot of tea wasted. It was more an act of civil disobedience.

I find it disturbing that an American would compare the Boston Tea Party with roadside bombings and 9/11.

Answer 4

Terrorism by definition is an act that terrorizes civilians in order to threaten or coerce a government or society.

The Tea Party certainly attempted to coerce the British government to change its Tea Tax (due to taxation without representation); however, this act did not terrorize civilians.

Well, there was that one guy who is terrorized at the thought of no tea; however, we ignore him...

Answer 5

Possibly could be called an act of terrorism.....but the BIG diffrence is...they didn't kill, or even hurt, anyone!
It was basically an act of defiance, kind of like kids during Vietnam burning their draft cards.
So please do not put the Boston Tea Party next to 9/11 , the USS Cole, or the African Embassy bombings and compare them.
Its not even in the same realm!

Answer 6

Left wing moron's ought to provide up re-writing history and start up making use of thier brains for once. Terrorism has always been acts made in defiance which cost lives. Who gained harm in the approach the Boston Tea celebration ? Englands income ? And todays Tea get at the same time flow is stuffed with all political opinions for the uninformed in the marketplace. certain, possibly that you'll argue more effective proper wing provided that its the right it really is adversarial to considerable authorities way more effective than the left wing is, inspite of the undeniable fact that it truly is a collective of persons which have not lost thier balls in this us of a to face up in course of govt being out of control and dropping taxpayer funds. in the shape you probably did not understand, the federal authorities produces no longer something, they rob funds from its voters to pay for the best deal, and in the adventure that they act like a spoiled toddler seeking to get the best deal they prefer, they have were given to provide you more effective funds. The Tea Partiers have tremendous the fraud, waste, abuse and lies and as a set have stood as a lot as say no more effective. for someone unfavorable to that view, might want to be you may want to save in options shifting to a socialist us of a. For what fund, what application or initiative hasn't authorities tried to promote to the persons as a good suggestion , then been stuck with thier fingers in the till, bankrupting it, stealing from Peter to pay Paul ? Social protection ? Medicare ? the overall fund......bypass on, attempt to call in uncomplicated words one.

Answer 7

I would call it a peaceful protest, or civil disobedience. Nobody was hurt, and in effect, the only negative result was that some people had to go without tea for a while. Inconvenient maybe, but not terrorism.

Answer 8

Actually, many Americans know their country was freed from British domination first by resistance then by insurgency and finally by revolution. Many of the early fighters in the revolution used guerrilla tactics, and the army was composed mostly of militia.

Many American southerns are still proud of the civil war effort, even though they lost badly. They minimize the fact that a major reason for the war was that the south wanted to spread slavery westward, and the north wanted to phase it out. Once the civil war began, the confederate soldiers fought bravely to defend their homeland and way of life, it wasn't all about slavery then. They are still proud of their skillful generals such as Robert E. Lee, and their resourceful resistance against the larger and richer north. For many years southerners resented the humiliating northern occupation and "reconstruction" which was imposed on them.

If Americans thought about it, they would see many parallels between their history and what is going on in the middle east. So in order to keep public opinion squarely on the side of what the Bush administration wants, the history of the middle east conflicts is minimized, the political aspects are denied, and all conflict is portrayed as motivated by mindless, fanatical terrorism, springing out of a alien religion that seeks world domination.

Answer 9

No, it was an act of rebellion against England.....that could possibly make it treason....but not terrorism.....it was a party, they just were making enough tea for everyone

Answer 10

It was more an act of protest rather than an act of terrorism.....