Does he just want his 15 minutes of fame or what ?
2006-08-17 09:59:53 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
I think every one in the world knows a lot about the case, it was on every copy of People,Star, and National Enquirer for years.
2006-08-17 10:11:07 · update #1
I don't think he killed her. I think he's some sick freak who wants media attention. Unless his DNA is under her fingernails, they will never find him guilty anyway. He is a perv though, why else would he be living in Thailand? So he can pick up 10-14 y/o prostitutes. He should be hung just for that.
2006-08-17 10:04:21 · answer #1 · answered by brianseltz 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋
What made him confess after 10 years? This story has raised even more concerns, it is horrible that this little girl that he so-called was "in love with" as the news media said, suffered a fate so horrible, why did it come out AFTER JonBenet's Mother passed from her illness? Sometimes it takes a very long time to catch a killer, did he do it? Only time will tell. If he did then he is one very disturbed individual, cannot even call him a man, how can you "accidentally" kill a little girl. She would be around 16 had she been allowed to live. Sometimes people make me wonder. R.I.P. JonBenet Ramsey.
2006-08-17 17:10:47 · answer #2 · answered by spiritcavegrl 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'm waiting for the DNA results. His story is inconsistent with the evidence from what the news is reporting. And his wife says that he was with her. He could just be looking for his 15 minutes of fame. I don't know. But why would you lie about something like this? You have to be sick to do so.
2006-08-17 21:09:29 · answer #3 · answered by Pinky 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I personally think he is just another one looking for a fifteen minutes of fame. He actually contradicted himself in the first ten second of the brief interview with reporters.
He said that he loved the little girl but she died accidentally. and when he was asked if he is Innocent, he replied "no".!!!!!!!!!!
So "accident" or "guilty"? Which one to buy?
2006-08-18 02:46:23 · answer #4 · answered by honeybun 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe this guy did not commit this particular crime - hopefully the DNA results will show that . . .
he may be 'found guilty' and held accountable for this killing - as our society seems to 'need' closure - whether or not it's valid.
Apart from this case ---
this person appears to be one who may need to be restricted in a 'free' society - as he definitely appears to have some mental imbalance that can allow him to be a menace to others.
2006-08-17 17:14:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
they say there's some evidence, to justify them bringing him all the way from Singapore there has to be something.. I'm sure he's not the first one to confess to this crime,there are always allot in high profile cases. I hope they have a good case against him if it's true.. God rest her lil soul
2006-08-17 17:16:45 · answer #6 · answered by scooterpie 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think he's just a looney toon. He was obsessed with JonBenet and the Krause (I think) case, according to a family member. He didn't do it, but he'll go down for it.
2006-08-17 17:07:33 · answer #7 · answered by rjguy 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
he knows alot about the case but it is all after the fact info. He didnt do it. He is just a crazy man.
2006-08-17 17:05:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
hi
2006-08-17 17:11:05 · answer #9 · answered by spcool02 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
he took so long to confess because he thought they'd never get him. And once they did get close to him than he confessed. If no one had a clue you killed someone and it had been years since it happened would you confess?
2006-08-17 17:07:44 · answer #10 · answered by Nikki 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋