I was watching cnn also.. I didnt hear about that till now. I think he may just be wanting attention. I also think its screwqy that he was obsessed with the Klaas case... HMMM?? * I know there was word that she had been killed with the garage door handle, and that it was missing. As soon as the DNA is back it should be cleared up. I also dont think he is nuts at all. I think he likes sitting there in the spotlight. I think he believes he will live in infamy like Bundy.
2006-08-17 08:10:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
The confessor was facing child molestation charges in Thailand. He may have figured since he is caught now and going to face either Jail or Punishment, he may as well come clean. There is something horribly fishy about the whole thing, but keep in mind that the information that we hear is skewed by the media. In most cases that we hear about, we make a decision based on media information. Even in the courtroom, the truth is manipulated. The only people who really know the truth are the people directly involved. Regardless of all of the hype, keep in mind the tragedy involved with the death of this wonderful child. If her parents are innocent, how should the public who crucified them feel?
2006-08-17 15:16:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by djk 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm no doctor, but I thought I read somewhere that the date rape drug Rohypnol is very hard to detect in the bloodstream. Maybe by the time the autopsy was done, the drug had left her blood?
I'll tell you what though, and hindsight is 20/20, but if I ever saw this guy teaching my kids I would be freaked out.
Classic Pedophile look all over this guy.
2006-08-17 15:12:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by Morty 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
There's something fishy, all right. 1. It has taken 10 years.
Second, the police approached it in the wrong way.
Third some want to bes might confess, but it's not good enough.
I think the guy is just a confessing want to be. Although, some drugs aren't traceable.
2006-08-17 15:15:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Well, he knew the case very well it seems, a professor of his told him he should write a book because he had written a very well informed paper on it. So he would know better than to lie about the details...Either way, his obsession with JonBenet and the case is excessive. I thought it was creepy that on a resume he included the fact that he bathed his charges each night...
2006-08-17 15:13:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by erin7 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
they ALL say it was an accident, like he thinks if it was an accident he'll get out to do it again. Some drugs don't show up. He's a freak I know that and whether he did it or just wants attention it will be good if he is off the streets and you know he'll be convicted if he goes to trial.
2006-08-17 15:51:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Of course he is going to say it was an accident, he is insane and was attempting to have sex with a 6 year old. Also, look at all the stuff he is getting in trouble for in Thailand. AND he was obsessed with JonBenet, I think he is nuts and needs to fry.
2006-08-17 15:23:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by emmadropit 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I still to this day think the parents had something to do with it they wouldn't do a lie detector test and they would never talk to the police without one another now why in the world would you not do a lie test is you were being accused of killing your child or not talk to the police unless you were both together they were hiding something and it makes me sick to think there are people in the world like that
2006-08-17 15:16:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by jdsb121305 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
She was garroted, yet he keeps insisting it was an 'accident'. I think poor JonBenet was the victim of a peodophile. I have no idea why her mother and father covered up for him.
2006-08-17 15:12:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by Sorcha 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't think we will ever know what really happened
And I thought that was strange about the drugs??
Hopefully someone in the case will address this issue.
2006-08-17 15:23:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by daack7 4
·
1⤊
0⤋