Why are many people in favor of DIVERSITY also in favor of everyone mixing so as to become ONE race?

Question

This liberal logic doesn't make sense.

Answer 1

Excellent question. Respondent #2 had already answered the question quite thoroughly. I can give you additional information that few people know.


The belief that races are a social construct, and that there is only one race- the human race, is the result of the innate psychological desire to disrupt fine clear defined truth with the mindset of crude blind seepingness. The fundamental truth that they enjoy disrupting is one of the two fundamental truths of existence. It is the fundamental truth that all entities are separate and defined.

Speaking of races, and of people being separate and distinct, the leftists themselves are more likely to belong to certain races, or what we would call subraces. Look at their appearance. The leftists are more likely to have the traits of flat fatty faces and large wide lips. The reason that that correlation exists is because fundamental intent, and therefore political positions, are determined by the genes. Fundamental intent also causes aesthetic preferences. Therefore, people of a particular fundamental intent reproduce with people with the corresponding aesthetic traits, thus mixing the genes of appearance and fundamental intent.

Speaking of races, it should also be noted that different human races are in fact different subspecies. Our species is homo sapien. There should therefore be 'homo sapien africanus', 'homo sapien australus', 'homo sapien asiaticus', and others.


Notice that this excellent answer got 1 bad rating and 0 good ratings (as of the present). That is proof that the rating system is being abused by fanatical proselytizers.

Respondent 15's (Rachel) statement is false; subspecies can interbreed. It is species that are usually incapable of interbreeding, though even some species can breed with eachother; taxonomy is not determined just by what can breed with what. Rachel's statement is therefore either a lie, or an uneducated statement based upon someone else's lie, who she trusted.

Read respondent #12's (currently named Rye Guy) address to me. Evidently he was the person that gave me the negative vote. Notice how he falsely portrays deceptive fanatical proselyism as mere disagreement (disagreement is made with argument statements, not sly deception which serves to invalidate an opponent's statements in the first place). False portrayal of unscrupulous tactics as mere disagreement is a common behavior of fanatical proselytizers. Notice also how he libellously falsely portrays my socially-responsible act of being caused by a 'martyrdom complex', and as being a compensation for logically-weak statements ("need all the help they can get"). Libellous false portrayal of motives is another common behavior of fanatical proselytizers. Anyway, I rest my case. Not only has Rye Guy proven that the bad rating was the act of a fanatical proselytizer, but he has also shown that it is the act of an actual criminal (i.e. a libeller).

Answer 2

The short answer would be it's the idea of "Let's get along with our differences while we still have them. Someday, all this mixing will result in a population with more evenly distributed traits, and all this attention to superficial phenotypical differences will be over."

Of course it won't happen like that, but it's a logic I much prefer to the conservative logic of "Let us eschew diversity, while at the same time enacting copious amounts of legislation that further diversifies our society, and on top of that let's make class mobility increasingly difficult, maybe even impossible. Also, let us plug our ears and ignore every damn scientist on the planet."


Science: Maybe your one bad rating (which may have been from me) is not proof that there are fanatical proselytizers here. Instead, perhaps it is proof that ONE PERSON DISAGREES WITH YOU. But you can fake your own martyr complex as you see fit. Lord knows your arguments here need all the help they can get.

Science, if I were the one who gave you the negative vote, I would be the authority on the motives behind that vote. No deception intended, I flatly disagree with you. I'm not proselytizing, since I am speaking to you directly, and you alone. It is also not libel (which is not a crime, strictly, but rather a civil matter; libel cases do not go to criminal court), since any negative things said are said directly to you, and you alone. Moreover, I do not claim that my opinions are fact. Please get out your dictionary and look up libel, or call your local newspaper. They should be able to elucidate the true meaning of that word.

Your arguments are weak and lack factual support. On top of that, your arguments are circular, overly defensive, and contain numbingly redundant adjectives and adverbs ("libellously falsely", for instance). Your prose in this arena is a cognitive and stylistic nightmare.

But putting all that aside, you even spelled my name wrong, when it is printed RIGHT HERE ON THE PAGE. Why the hell should I take you seriously? You, sir, are dismissed. Thank you for your opinions.

Answer 3

Um, well, race doesn't exist in general. It's just a variety of cultures and skin colors people categorize into "race." Diversity is more realistic, yea. What we need is worldwide respect and acceptance to the understanding of different cultures and for everyone to quit being ethnocentric.

Answer 4

That sounds more like a freaky Aryan ideal to me... who wants to breed people into some sort of super/mixed race?
I suppose it would produce a lot of gorgeous, smart people with strong immue systems, as thats generally what 'hybrids' turn out to be.
I think whats going on is that those people you are talking about enjoy differences... AND freedom of choice in their lives. Funny that.

Oh and Science, the question you are answering begs to differ with you... sub species can't interbreed and produce viable offspring, thats one of the definitions of a species. Like it or not, humanity is one species, homo sapiens and we have to learn to live with that.

Answer 5

The liberals think that mixing a white person with a black person would make the ideal person. Brains and sporting ability hmm. But, it normally turns out that the brains disappear and so does the sporting ability.

Answer 6

What idiots, you have to be from the USA. There is only one race of humans on earth, Homo Sapiens, you voids for brains just get warped out of shape about the packaging.
Grow up. There isn't any difference between people but the exterior wrapping.

Answer 7

Unity doesn't allow for the Liberals to play race, gender and sexual proclivity against each other.

Answer 8

The resulting mixed racial would hardly qualify as one race.

Answer 9

If everyone looks the same then maybe just maybe we can all get along, ignorance is going to be the death of this society.

Answer 10

We are one race already, the human race. There are no races within humanity, it's a misunderstanding.