theres lots of creeps out there who confess to crimes they didnt commit, wierd but true. im suspicious, are you?
2006-08-17 06:09:06 · 18 answers · asked by mex-o-funk 3 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
munya has a good point, the dna will tell! i kinda dont think he did it. just a gut feeling.
2006-08-17 06:19:19 · update #1
the killer will never b found
2006-08-17 06:14:02 · answer #1 · answered by fuzzycakes 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
i think of it replaced into an intruder.. in all danger a foreigner or a member of a sadistic pedophilia team. I say that throughout the time of keeping with intuitive resourceful and prescient greater beneficial than genuine deduction. i know that what Patsy did in cleansing the data replaced into extraordinarily suspicious and unhelpful, yet in her very own extraordinarily despairing innovations on the time, pondering how some human beings are variety of conservative neatfreaks /niceknicks (no longer understanding if she replaced into or no longer) i can in basic terms see the cleansing taking place quote unquote innocently. it may additionally be a fashion of psychological denial of actuality, hiding from the international. It replaced right into a terrribly unhappy ingredient for all.
2016-09-29 09:12:33 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I still believe someone in the family murdered that child. This man just wants to be in the public eye. Although he does come off as a little wierd. I watched the movie on lifetime and read the story time and time again and i firmly believe her family was involved one way or another.
2006-08-17 06:15:53 · answer #3 · answered by shawn_0523 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I agree with you 100%. I think he just wants to get out of whatever trouble he's gotten into in Taiwan (he is facing charges in California from 5 yrs ago, kiddie porn, and he skipped out on THAT), so he copped to the JonBenet murder to get on tv, get a few free meals and a jet ride back to the USA.
The DNA will prove or disprove this, right?!
2006-08-17 06:14:58 · answer #4 · answered by Munya Says: DUH! 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Some times sickos cross path with other sickos who tell them how they killed someone. He may just know the killer. I hope it is solved for the Ramsey's sake however, if he isn't the killer he is one cruel animal.
2006-08-17 06:21:49 · answer #5 · answered by ciza29 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The next couple of weeks will tell.
I sure hope it's not just some wacko confessing to something he didn't do. Her dad has been through enough the past 10 years plus her mom just died a couple of months ago.
2006-08-17 06:15:39 · answer #6 · answered by JW 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont think he did it. I think he is just a creep that liked the little girl. On yahoo news i read that he said he drugged her and then raped her. Well the police said that there were no drugs or any traces of that sort in her body?! They said she was molested though, so they dont know why he said he drugged her.
2006-08-17 06:47:22 · answer #7 · answered by graygirl 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
From what I heard on the news, he knew certain things that only the real killer would know. Also, the DNA points to him.
2006-08-17 06:15:14 · answer #8 · answered by brucenjacobs 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's hard to tell. the police will have to corroberate his story with respect to what the crime scene looked like , & information that only the killer would know.
2006-08-17 06:17:45 · answer #9 · answered by Blaque Inque 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think he killed her. From what i just read he admitted he drugged her and raped her. It was a "kidnapping gone wrong" so he paniced and killed her. Then he moves out of the country? hmmm to me something seems off........
2006-08-17 06:33:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
According to CNN, he knew details about the crime that were not make public, and only the murderer would have known.
2006-08-17 06:16:55 · answer #11 · answered by cross-stitch kelly 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋