I think the answeris clear
2006-08-17 05:39:11 · 20 answers · asked by Charles Dobson Focus on the Fam 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
LOL... a ******* is worse than driving the world to closer to war. republicans are so out of touch... this is why we should fear them more than the terrorists. they are far more dangerous to america than any "terrorist"
2006-08-17 05:49:20 · update #1
Definitely illegal unprovoked invasion of another country.
2006-08-17 05:45:04 · answer #1 · answered by iwannarevolt 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Illegal Unprovoked Invasion of Another Country!!!!!!!
Oral sex in the oval office has been going on since the White House has been built. So if anyone should be getting any kind of sex in the oval office it should be the president.
Trust me bombing innocent people & distroying their homes & way of life is so much worse than getting caught with your pants down...
Besides "IF" said President is caught having oral gratification in "His" office that should be between him, his wife & his God...I could careless...And I shouldn't have to pay taxes for some stupid trial either....
2006-08-17 12:58:27 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Obviously, the unprovoked invasion of Iraq was worse on a humanitarian scale. It cost the lives of over 50,000 innocent people, and the toll is still rising. The war was indeed illegal based on international law. However, Clinton lied to a grand jury about having sexual relations, which is perjury. Based on US laws, one action is legal and the other is not. Based on international laws, one is legal and one is not. So I guess it depends on your point of view.
2006-08-17 12:55:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
You are correct, the answer is clear -- the perjury that went with the Oval Office oral is far worse than either of the aforementioned offenses.
2006-08-17 12:46:31 · answer #4 · answered by Lonnie P 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Oral sex didn't hurt anyone and probably even provided some satisfaction and made a couple of people feel good. On the other hand, an invasion into another country that has killed thousands hasn't really made anyone feel good.
IMPEACH BUSH!!!!
2006-08-17 13:00:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Oral sex in the oval office, when it's lied about before a federal grand jury, used to subjourn perjury, used as an excuse to deny someone their civil rights... is much worse than an alleged illegal and unprovoked invasion... Here's a question for you, if you're smart enough to answer it, which is more damaging to the Constitution and the Rule of Law?
2006-08-17 12:46:21 · answer #6 · answered by trc_6111 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Nobody get killed doing oral sex except you have an infection. But people get killed by military invsions. Just like those innocent souls that died in Iraq, Somalia, Palestine, Lebanon, Iran i could go on and on and in all other places where the western countries gave them weapons legally and illegally.
2006-08-17 12:51:44 · answer #7 · answered by MAFOKOCHIZHI 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Well, obviously BOTH would be worse. Did Clinton go to the UN over Bosnia? Did they attack us when I wasn't watching? Oh yeah, he forgot. Possibly too busy having oral sex in the oval office.
2006-08-17 12:48:06 · answer #8 · answered by MEL T 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
the second one unprovoked invasion of another country
2006-08-17 12:54:48 · answer #9 · answered by joey 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Ten points to you ! People just don't get it ! America is in serious trouble and they compare Clinton to Bush! It is very clear Bush has Failed America!!
2006-08-17 13:05:34 · answer #10 · answered by jdfnv 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋