Just wondering ppls opinions.
2006-08-17 05:24:23 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
I think that John Mark Karr is one of those people that are delusional to reality. I can only give my opinions and facts based on this case that is developing. If he is convicted, then the evidence is all there in front of us: the vaginal bruise, the strangulated neck, the ransom note, and a connection to her (the usual all signs point to him). From what I'm reading from various news report, he seem to distant himself from anybody that cares about him (his father thought he was dead, his wife divorced him in 2001, lack of teaching skills according to an superintendent who hired him twice as a substitute). Excluding law enforcements and the Ramsey's, I think that some would forget that we were looking for the murder in the first place and thought that this would be one of those cases that was never meant to be solved (the Natalie Holloway case is still one of those cases that's not solved yet). Heck, they even made a TV-movie about this w/o the resolution (maybe they should add the alternate ending right about now). When the news broke, I was wondering why would law enforcement from all over the country would have John Mark Karr as their prime suspect in this case, besides the obvious confession?
1) When the murder was still a hot topic, a professor assign Karr to write a paper about the Ramsey case because Karr done enough research about the little girl. Ever since, according to his ex-wife, he has constantly read about the Ramsey case, as well as the 1993 abduction and slaying of Polly Klaas, a resident of Petaluma (where Karr lived at that time).
2) He has a history of child pornography charges and still settling his case in Thailand about those charges. His profession as a teacher makes it easy for him to get close to children (he even have three of his own) yet he doesn't have the sufficient skill to be a teacher (as stated above).
3) The key factor leading into Karr's arrest might be link to a producer who made a documentary about this case. Michael Tracey had contact with Karr for two years and when Karr started sending weird messages on e-mail with special codes that link to the Ramsey case, Tracey called Boulder PD.
Again, these are just facts developing right now based on witness accounts of Karr and there might be more in the near future. The usual family members are defending Karr (brother is denying it, ex-wife saying he was somewhere else) but I can see that Karr did this out of his obssesed love for JonBenet, which to me is not a right thing in his state of mind. Why would he moved out of the country in the first place? If it deems true, I think that he might be guilty, considering that he has the making of being a child molester and sex offender.
2006-08-17 06:57:53 · answer #1 · answered by mojo8983 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Something is not yet brought out, cuz it is not all adding up yet. If I remember correctly, there was a semen sample left behind, and we'll see if it matches. But the question is,,, were her parents home at the time? Did they know that Karr was down in the basement with their daughter? Did they wonder why he came up alone, and didn't they look to see where she was at that time? We haven't heard the whole truth yet.
2006-08-17 05:30:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
He grow to be in all likelihood approximately to stand quotes in Thailand, and - incredibly than sit down in a Thai penal complex - chosen to take a unfastened luxurious flight lower back to the U.S. the place he comprehend the charges interior the Ramsey case could be brushed off. If he's sentenced for porno quotes in California, he will serve time in a greater gentle U.S. penal complex, write a e book which will become a blockbuster action picture, be freed, and retire in luxurious along with his own little blond-haired intercourse slaves someplace interior the Caribbean. Face it: he outsmarted the morons at place of beginning protection, regulation enforcement officers, and all individuals who relatively needed this tragic case to be solved. -RKO-
2016-12-11 10:25:58 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why is he saying he picked her up from school and took her to the basement and killed her?
1. It was x-mas time with NO school
2. She died at night/early morning after her parents put her to bed
I guess DNA will determine if he is lying or not, but honestly I wouldn't be surprised if he was just obsessed with the case and said he killed her for his own psychotic reasons!
2006-08-17 05:30:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
He looks like a sicko for little boys instead of little girls. I don't know if he's lying or not but the fact that he didn't live in Colorado is weird.
/
2006-08-17 05:36:55 · answer #5 · answered by Pashur 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He's lying. Funny, ppl hear a few news stories and automatically believe his confession. Some ppl are too GD stupid for words.
2006-08-17 05:36:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
They just keep on say he is lying on the news but the sister just said there is a DNA match,but I don't know what to believe.
2006-08-17 05:35:05 · answer #7 · answered by ffxkh 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes he is Lying, now he says he drug her but there was no drugs in her body! His ex wife says he was in Alabama
2006-08-17 05:30:36 · answer #8 · answered by momie_2bee 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think it is a very good possibility! Why else would his EX-wife defend him?? (or accuse him of lying....) Wouldnt she want to see him in jail instead of on the streets free? I dont think she would protect him. but then again she could have something to do with it. Like it was both of them planning to kidnap her for the money, but he killed her and her job now is to protect him. Idk....
2006-08-17 05:32:09 · answer #9 · answered by RachMeist 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Why is his ex-wife saying he was with her in Alabama the day Jon Benet was killed.
2006-08-17 05:28:52 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋