sorry i put down the wrong dates last time(thought at least some of you more mature people would have guessed that!!) i last had sex with her on the 17/08/00 and the child was born on 28/06/01 thats 45 wks, that seems pretty long, can i be the father? i thought a normal pregnancy lasts 38-40wks 42max??
2006-08-17 04:33:15 · 24 answers · asked by johno 1 in Pregnancy & Parenting ➔ Pregnancy
My daughter was born on 6-17 but was due 6-28 and I know I concieved her in the end of Sept beginning of October so I doubt your the father.
2006-08-17 04:46:07 · answer #1 · answered by a.kranz 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How many times are you going to ask this question? You asked twice three weeks ago and three times since yesterday. How many times do we have to tell you to get a test done?
Go here and put in the due date of 6/28/01 and you will see conception should have happened on Thurs 10/5/00.
http://www.justmommies.com/pregnancy_calendar.php
You say she was two weeks late though so let's assume the due date was 6/14/01 (exactly 14 days prior). If you put in this date you will see conception should have happened on Thurs 9/21/00.
You said the last time you had sex with her was 8/17/00. SO, EVEN IF she was two weeks late it is not possible you are the father. Get a DNA test so you can show her - and stop asking us t his question!!!
2006-08-17 04:40:44 · answer #2 · answered by BabyRN 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There could be a possibility. Some pregnancies due last over 42 weeks if it is the 1st child. Some doctors feel if there is not jeopardy in the baby or the mother then she can continue to carry the baby until another date. So if you still have doubts get a DNA test
2006-08-17 04:40:13 · answer #3 · answered by ladythuganomics 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
45 weeks is a long time! but did you know that a mans sperm can lay inside a woman for a while after intercourse before actually meeting the egg? im not sure exactly but ive heard that it does. also as sombody else has already said the due date is taken from her last period not when you had sex last.
I was 10 days over my due date (40 weeks) and was told i had to get induced because it may cause the baby harm if it is too late.
2006-08-17 04:50:22 · answer #4 · answered by suzexxx 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes it does sound pretty long and you are right about 38-42 weeks. Did she give birth naturally or was she induced because it was overdue? If she says she gave birth naturally (ie. not induced then she's probably lying). Saying that it could be a rare pregnancy so get a DNA test because I don't want to stir trouble in case she is telling the truth!
2006-08-17 04:41:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
an actual pregnancy isnt forty weeks if im right...i could be wrong....you see the date the child is due is calculated from the date of her last period so it doent matter what date the child was concieved??? ur best bet would be to ask a doctor??? do you know the date of her last period??? and her due date??? thats how youd work it out best....im sure youll get a better awnser anyway.... would you not just get a paternity test done...if its your child and shes sure of it she should have no problem with this!!!! and at least ul know then for definate you know???
2006-08-17 04:42:39 · answer #6 · answered by sillybean 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Some people get their dates wrong, or their baby is just content in the womb and doesn't want to be born. I know of many mothers who've gone way over their time.
However, you've obviously got issues which aren't going to go away. Ask for a DNA test. The person who you should be talking to is the mother and obviously you don't trust her. Get a DNA test.
2006-08-17 04:44:25 · answer #7 · answered by True Blue Brit 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it is a possibility if the newborn grow to be late. women human beings's our bodies take diverse quantities of time to augment a toddler. My aunt has 7 childrens and had all of them after in uncomplicated words 7 and a 1/2 months, and they were all 'time period' children bodily and fully wholesome. My mom had 4 childrens, and carried us all to easily about 10 months!! It varies....yet there's a key component right here....merely about all cutting-aspect medical doctors gained't enable a lady bypass previous 40 2 weeks gestation anymore as a well-known rule b/c it is no longer good for the toddler. Ask about the age of her well being care provider. If he/she is older then they gained't take advantage of this rule. It doesn't sound in all probability....yet i'd have a dna try executed if I were you...exceptionally formerly you dish out a dime. regularly, ask your self in case you may believe this lady.
2016-11-25 22:28:45 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes 45 weeks is way too long. no prenatal doctor would let you go that long. i have 2 kids and with `my first, i was 2 weeks late and that was even long...i went through a midwife, that is why she let me go overdue that long. she was 9 pds, 4 and a half ounces because of it. and with my 2nd, they induced me 3 days early rom his due date cuz my mom died ...that was through a normal doctor and she could not even belive that i went 2 weeks overdue with my first. my 2nd was 7pds, 11 ounces, a boy!!! get a DNA test, i highly doubt u are the father. If she went 45 weeks, that must of been a big *ucking baby. highly unlikely!!!
2006-08-17 04:42:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Conception isn't an exact science. The period from conception through gestation, to birth is only calculated from her last period prior to catching. You could still be the father, if she caught late in her cycle.
If you're that much in doubt, ask for a dna test - though your girlfriend might be miffed if you are the only one who could be the father. Explain its for your own peace of mind, and in no way meant to offend her.
2006-08-17 04:43:14 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋