Which would you prefer and why (what would you do?). 100 years extra life in good health or $1,000,000,000,000 US?
2006-08-17 04:29:59 · 67 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
give me the billion. I like to live lavish and help soo many people. i'll make a mark before i die.
2006-08-17 04:34:01 · answer #1 · answered by savio 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The money. Living extra long would almost ensure that I would have to see my husband, all my friends, and possibly one or two of my children die, and the extra time isn't worth that. Besides, if I live to 70 or 80, isn't that time enough? With the money I could not only start a foundation and help people, but I could also live a much grander life, filled with adventure and travel. However, were I to know that I was going to die in a year, I would take the extra time.
2006-08-17 04:39:29 · answer #2 · answered by reverenceofme 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd take the money, because in 100 years everyone I know would be gone and I'd be alone. I wouldn't know anyone, I'd be all alone and I'd probably be broke too. Sounds like a major bummer. If my loved ones and friends were given the same choice and allowed to live an extra 100 years, I'd go with the extra time rather than the money.
2006-08-17 04:36:05 · answer #3 · answered by dmc81076 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
At first, I thought the 100 years extra life would be the one. But I wouldn't want to outlive all of my loved ones by so long. So I think I'll take that 1 trillion dollars and make a difference in the world!
2006-08-17 04:35:13 · answer #4 · answered by kja63 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would take the $1,000,000,000,000. With the money you can pay doctors to make you healthy through medecine. I don't want to live 100 years or so. With the money you can lavish yourself. Live a very comfortable life.
2006-08-17 04:35:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The money because the world will probably end before that 100 years can be collected. Not to mention, you could use that money to have an incredible life with the time left, which could never be possible during that 100 years (unless you used that 100 years to hit a loto jackpot).
2006-08-17 04:34:20 · answer #6 · answered by youdontneedtoknowme 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Life
2006-08-17 04:32:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would prefer 100 years extra life in good health because despite the fact that money is very useful and powerful nowadays, it can't buy everything. You can't buy love with money...(you can I suppose...fake love). I would love to live another century to see the different changes that are being done to the world.
2006-08-17 04:36:05 · answer #8 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd prefer the money. Because if I'm going to live for another 100 years, even in good health, I'll feel very lonely cos all the people I love would have left me
2006-08-17 04:35:09 · answer #9 · answered by panic-over-nothin 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would go for the money - as sad as that sounds
I would not like to outlive - and lets face it I would - alot of my friends and family - yes I would see the world for 100 yrs but how many heartaches would I suffer because a close person left.
The money however could make my life, my family and my friends lives better - as well as helping a few charities out there
2006-08-17 04:34:39 · answer #10 · answered by schmushe 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The money. I don't want to out live my children. It just isn't right to see every one you love die. What good would the extra 100 years do you if you had no loved ones to share it with?
2006-08-17 04:35:14 · answer #11 · answered by flyingbumblebee 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋