if your talking about the world cup...they won.
2006-08-17 04:28:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by Alisia A. 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Holland-Portugal experience is a much cry from the "attractive sport". The refereeing is unquestionably not for the solid of the game. international Cup 2006 will be remembered because the experience with the most yellows and reds with 2 referees redcarded via FIFA who i think deserve a yellow card for letting refereeing prevalent drop this low.. i experience sorry for Australia to have lengthy gone out that way yet they too percentage the blame for not having scored against 10-adult men Italy for an effective 40 minutes - their frame of mind to flow more beneficial 30min backfired. 3-time international champ Italy is very WC-savvy with smart gamers and they were 'searching' for that penalty even as the danger presented itself - there became contact interior the field, Fabio Grosso falling over Lucas Neill's body - ref determined for Italy interior the demise seconds. football is this merciless; it will kick you back interior the teeth in case you lose concentration. in spite of praise heaped on the Aussies WC heroic debut won't be able to be sufficient convenience.
2016-11-05 00:26:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by jenniffer 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because they used the friendly game to try out the players that are not in the first team or some new young players.
Not one of the players that were in the world cup winning team were in the team that lost to Croatia.
2006-08-17 04:32:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by Harje 1
·
2⤊
0⤋
because played the young rose of serie B (older was 18) and none of the players of the World Cup...
Champions of the World Cup are at seaside drinking "Champagne" and singing popooopoopoooo...
this was just a stupid experiment of the new coach..
2006-08-17 08:37:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by --Flavia-- 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
look at the squad that played. 8 of the players were getting their first cap. and the only member of the first team that played, was the back up to Buffon, Angelo Peruzzi
2006-08-17 05:32:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by luve112 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The players that was playing vs Croatia ,was first time playing together, I watched the game and I don't think that they were bad , all they need is more games!!!!!
2006-08-17 05:50:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because it was Italy playing, they are just losers and cheaters, even after winning the world cup, every one only talked about how Materazi insulted Zidane's family.
2006-08-17 04:28:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
If you takin bout italy vs spain then i dont really know,but all i know is that sapin won cause they played like professionals
2006-08-17 06:35:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by ËňİğϻᾱŤīĉ ŦŕǐᴄΚṨṮḛṙ™ 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
no, but i mean, ppl keep saying, how did the world cup champs loose? and what not. but you have to realize, almost 0 of their guys that played croatia actually played in the world cup. i mean, they didn't have cannavaro, pirlo, matterazzi. none of those guys. so, you just have to remember that when thinking about why they lost.
2006-08-17 04:51:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by sweetpanther08 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
They rested all the best first team players
2006-08-17 04:36:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by fw 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
more or less they'd relaxed after the WC. moreover it had no real significance for them, they'd obviously just won the biggest cup in national cup competition.
2006-08-19 13:58:08
·
answer #11
·
answered by sam 3
·
0⤊
0⤋