yeah I do
visit the following link to see the proof
[http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html]
or simply go to
www.badastronomy.com
and click on the link called apollo hoax
You'll see simple scientific proofs to disprove the TV show.
2006-08-17 04:33:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by gadha 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
The effectiveness of keeping a conspiracy intact is completely dependent on the number of people involved; the more people there are, the less likely the conspiracy will hold over time. There were literally tens of thousands of people involved in the Apollo program, and it has been over thirty years since the last lunar landing; faking the landings and keeping the people silent would have been more difficult than actually performing them.
On three of the Apollo missions, laser reflection dishes were set up which scientists use to this day to accurately calculate the distance between the Earth and the Moon. This equipment could only have been set up manually; no robotic missions could have performed these tasks.
The Clementine lunar satellite was able to take a picture of the Apollo 15 landing site, but the resolution was too low (100 meters) to be considered overwhelming evidence. The Indian space program plans to send a remote sensing spacecraft in 2007, called Chandrayaan I, which has a five meter resolution. Assuming the craft is successful, its images should provide definitive evidence that the moon landings were real.
No matter what evidence one provides, however, someone will always come up with an excuse to negate it. "The scientists are in on the conspiracy with the laser reflector experiment", or "The images from the satellite are fake", or "They set up the Apollo landing sites afterwards using robots". One has to set their own limits on when evidence becomes definitive, and then stand by that limit.
2006-08-17 09:00:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by ndcardinal3 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
The Apollo Moon landing hoax accusations are a set of related beliefs that some or all elements of the Apollo Moon landings did not occur as they are described by NASA, but were instead faked by NASA and, possibly, members of other involved organizations. Various individuals have advanced a number of different theories, which tend, to varying degrees, to include the following common elements:
The Apollo Astronauts did not land on the Moon;
NASA and possible others deliberately deceived the public to conceal this, manufacturing or tampering with evidence like photos, telemetry tapes, transmissions and rock samples.
A 1999 Gallup poll indicates that some 89% of Americans (what Gallup describes as an "overwhelming majority") believe the Apollo landings happened as reported while 6% believe that 'the US goverment staged or faked the landings.' The mainstream scientific and technical communities reject the claims as baseless.
2006-08-17 04:28:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
I am old enough to remember seeing the TV coverage of every American space flight since Alan Shepherd. Special effects in TV and in the movies could not come close to what I was seeing on TV at that time. Anyone wanting to continue believing that all this was a NASA hoax is a fool.
2006-08-18 11:38:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by tom5551 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I heard it was a fixed up that we landed on the moon, and I was watching an inter view about John Glen, and when he was being inter viewed he said that the space program is not some ting that he's mostly not the most proud of thing he did in his career.
2006-08-17 04:31:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by Dragonpack 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
YES! I don't understand people who just don't believe this didn't happen.
YES YES YES we LANDED ON THE MOON!!!!!
2006-08-17 04:37:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Definitely!
2006-08-17 04:28:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
No one would risk to tell such a big lie,and the Soviets were watching
2006-08-17 06:49:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by qwine2000 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes I do. I am old enough to remember watching it on TV.
2006-08-17 04:27:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by lynda_is 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
Yes, because they can see the leftover stuff from all the the satellites & telescopes still there.
2006-08-17 04:29:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by fairly smart 7
·
1⤊
1⤋