English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

wht do u think abt the killer's confession as the murderer of ms ramsey and your opinion on the whole case fr 1996 till today?

2006-08-17 03:28:33 · 13 answers · asked by Hermione J.Potter 3 in News & Events Current Events

13 answers

I answered a similar question a few minutes ago. This case has garnered more publicity than any other since the Lindberg baby kidnapping and murder. Some believe an innocent man, also something of a misfit, was not the killer then, and we should not rush to judgment now. Sure, this recent perv to come forward looks too good to be true, and he probably is. I think he may well have used his knowledge of the circumstances of the case, which he may have acquired through research, to use as leverage to get out of a Thai jail. He seems to have gotten into some kind of trouble in Thailand. We'll just have to wait and see if he continues to claim involvment in the case.

One thing that bothers me is that he stated the little girl's death was an accident, but he has not come out and said publicly that he killed her. He has put himself at the scene but not really confessed. He has said he is "not innocent." That is a far cry from saying he's guilty. He has left the door open for an escape.

I would not be at all surprised if it is discovered that there was another person down in the basement when Jon Benet was killed. This guy knew a lot of details the general public was not privy to, yet was the information he had classified. Could he have obtained it through public records, or could someone who really was at the crime scene when the murder occured have told him what happened?

It's circles within circles. I hope this case gets solved while I'm still alive, but I'm afraid this guy may turn out to be another Bruno Haufman, someone we're just not sure about. There is already enough reasonable doubt to keep him from getting convicted.

May that sweet little girl and her mother rest in peace, because it is evident that her poor father is going to have to deal with this for a very long time.

2006-08-23 14:54:53 · answer #1 · answered by Tom 7 · 0 0

I think time will tell and eventually the killer will be identified. This individual is demented but that doesn't make him guilty. His wife's statement has already been challenged and she admitted that she could not swear to being with him Christmas 1996. There have been so many mistakes made with the case, that we might not see a solution. I think the best is to allow DNA and investigators to place the blame before making any decision based on media hype and Mr. Krazy's confession.

2006-08-22 15:51:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

ok, Liberals suspicious of Republicans i'm getting, yet why in the international are they gay? And no, i'm particularly satisfied as a Liberal if not a gay guy, even if it continues to be seen if he's the killer and this isn't a pretend confession. and that i do not imagine being Republicans has something to do with their being danger free or responsible. My purely recognize-how is they were media whores.

2016-11-05 00:21:47 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I asked the same question on here! I think he is lying! he was looking away and down he was blinking a lot to! He is a sick man who wants attention, and now his ex-wife is saying that he was with her the night it happened and there was no way he could have done it. But he read a lot on the Jonbenet case and the Polly Klaus's case, he's a classic sicko
I do not think her parents had a thing to do with it! Nor her brother, none of the DNA collected shows them!

2006-08-17 03:39:59 · answer #4 · answered by momie_2bee 5 · 0 0

He told us officials about details about the murder that was never disclosed by police or the news media and his DNA matched the murder scene. Looks like he has finally been caught, not let's hope the justice systems puts him away for good and not let him get out of jail in a few years on good behavior. I hate it when the court system does that. Once a pedophile always a pedophile.

2006-08-17 03:38:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

So what if someone confessed to the killing of Jon Benet. The fact of the matter is that Patsy Ramsey was the only real suspect and the pressure and guilt of killing her daughter sent her to and early grave. Karma.

2006-08-17 03:38:45 · answer #6 · answered by snakeofcharm 2 · 0 1

It's a con job. He didn't do it. How can one be in 2 states at the same time.

He just wants to get out of that prison in Tailand. Research how bad they are.

Once in the states, he can say what he wants, deny, appeal.....and eventually get off by reason of insanity

2006-08-17 03:36:22 · answer #7 · answered by greenie 6 · 2 0

Glad he is gone but I still feel the parents share some blame. The guy was attracted to her because of the beauty pagents they pushed her into. It doesn't justify her being killed but don't treat the dead mother or father with kids gloves.

2006-08-17 03:34:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

i was not sure at first what to think . was he just trying to get out of the jail system over there or did he really do this but now I'm convince that he did kill this girl .but he will have his day in court if found guilty i hope they give him the death penalty.

2006-08-17 03:37:12 · answer #9 · answered by idontkno 7 · 1 0

See the question two questions down

His ex-wife is claiming she was with him the night JonBenet was murdered and he could not have been there.

2006-08-17 03:34:47 · answer #10 · answered by Left the building 7 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers