on wensday ,the teacher announced that he was in love with her ,and the kiiling of the little girl is a mistake,do you really think hes saying the truth?
2006-08-17 02:55:16 · 13 answers · asked by ONE FRIENDLYGIRL2NO 2 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
I really hope that this case is finally solved but I am starting to be suspicious of this guy. He just sort of looked like he was loving the attention of the media. Like he was staring into the camera with this weird creepy pleased look. Maybe he's doing this confessing for the attention.
2006-08-17 03:10:49 · answer #1 · answered by coconut 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
i don't think of that this guy did it for some reason... i imagine he remains a pedophile and may be locked up.. he's truly a psychopath. yet i don't think of the dad and mom did it both... right that's one ingredient that does no longer upload up for me... Why might want to there be a ransom be conscious annoying $118,000? Why no longer $2 hundred or $one hundred or $100 and fifty? frequently an excellent #... yet John Ramsey had an advantage from artwork (I heard this right now on the info the day previous to this) This sounds like a baby has coated this up...or someone rather stupid... why adventure the greenback quantity? Who knew what John's bonus grow to be? Patsy and John are literally not stupid - they doesn't adventure the precise quantity.. And it did not seem as if an wise individual wrote the be conscious both... So, who knew about the bonus? Who knew the format? Who do they recognize it really is that dumb? or immature?
2016-11-25 22:20:15 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know, there is something wierd about this. I guess it's true, since they are saying he gave details that were not released to the public, but it just seems such a coincidence that he confesses now that he is in jail in a country where he is not a citizen and has no rights and he could face harsher punishment than in the U.S. Also, some people do this kind of stuff for the publicity so they can be a part of news history. I mean otherwise he'd probably be put to death without a "fair" trial in Thailand, so what does he have to lose by confessing to this?
2006-08-17 03:01:09 · answer #3 · answered by YouDon'tKnowMe 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
He reportedly told police details of the killing that were never released to the media, so he must have had something to do with it. It's just a shame Patsy never saw justice brought before her death and that the family suffered for all these years because the police bungled the whole investigation and were convinced the family had something to do with it.
2006-08-17 03:08:10 · answer #4 · answered by pynkbyrd 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
If his DNA matches that which was found on the little girl, yes. He was intending on taking her for ransom money. If he did I feel so sorry for the family. They was accused and battered by the news.
2006-08-17 03:08:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
i still feel that Patsy had something to do with it John, no. But patsy... yes. Karr wont admit how he knew the family or how he was let in the house... could it be that he knew her.. and she let him in???? i think so! there is something too weird about this...
2006-08-17 12:15:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bullsh!t.
He just wants to get out of that prison in Tailand. Research how bad they are.
Once in the states, he can say what he wants, deny, appeal.....and eventually get off by reason of insanity
2006-08-17 03:07:17 · answer #7 · answered by greenie 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
This case has been going on for so many years that I don't really know what to think.
2006-08-17 03:03:10 · answer #8 · answered by kittytalker 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Since he admitted it in front of a bazillion reporters on TV a short while ago, reckon he's the culprit.
2006-08-17 03:01:32 · answer #9 · answered by kristycordeaux 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Not the whole truth.
2006-08-17 03:07:30 · answer #10 · answered by evillyn 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋