English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

that they feel the need to invent absurd conspiracy theories and blame him for everything they dont like?

if an earthquake wre to destroy LA some progressive liberal will blame Bush.

2006-08-17 01:50:56 · 35 answers · asked by W E J 4 in Politics & Government Politics

itd funny the leftist cant come up with a factual reason, just make believe phoney baloney

2006-08-17 03:04:37 · update #1

35 answers

Easy , HE WON TWICE

2006-08-17 02:02:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

WOW!...there's a lot of anger and criticism out there...but, as usual, not many suggestions, plans, solutions offered. The Left just can't handle the fact that they are not in power and that America has a LEADER...NOT a poll follower. Leaders lead...sometimes don't make the best decisions...but they make decisions and follow thru. Bush is not a mealy mouthed, blown-by-the-wind-of-opinion whimp! AND...he isn't allowing America to be bullied and tax cuts have created more jobs and are increasing tax revenues, thereby lowering the deficit. But...we definitely need to get our borders under control and he IS a politician from a political party.

2006-08-17 02:15:32 · answer #2 · answered by just me 3 · 1 0

The left?? I do not hate Bush, what I do is I don't like how he is running the country. I do not need to make up anything he does enough bad things on his own with out making up fiction. In my opinion the worse thing he has done is send our children off to a war that was only manufactured for his own agenda. Now our children are coming back in body bags. Everything else he has done before and after that are bad but this is the worse. What are our children not dying fast enough on the streets of the USA that he has to ship them off to some foriegn country to die??? If he continues we wont even have a next generation they will all be in body bags....

2006-08-17 01:58:51 · answer #3 · answered by lost_soul 4 · 0 0

Maybe because Bush is so dishonest that he was elected as a Republican but has a foreign policy like Napoleon, the most dangerous leftist the world has ever seen. He is not good for civilization. Unless you think that a possible civil war in Iraq is a good thing. I'm not sure it is. It could be good because it would expose the extremists in the Arab world as fools. However it was Bush who brought this chaos to Iraq. Maybe liberals don't think it is good to export chaos.

2006-08-17 01:58:19 · answer #4 · answered by mouthbreather77 1 · 1 0

Because the Left is now strongly populated with Baby Boomers who were wearing sandals and beads in the sixties, protesting the war in VietNam, burning draft cards and trying to fight "The Man". Now they are "The Man" and are so full of self loathing for selling out everything that they supposedly stood for that they have to project that hate outward, and it is easiest to do it to a President from the opposite party. They still want to protest the war, even though it is the right thing to do to eradicate radical Islamists.

2006-08-17 03:01:33 · answer #5 · answered by sixfour76 3 · 0 0

I see your point. It is a little annoying the idea that one factor is to blame for all that is wrong ion the world.

I do think though, that he does not help himself in this. His attitude towards a delicate situation does unsettle me and i feel that a man with a little more guile and subtlety would deal with the problems in the middle east better.

Going back to your question though, even people in Britain hate him and seem to over look Blair's actions in all of this. There are always two sides to every story and many right wingers portray the left as pot smoking hippies- they are simply not all that way. I suppose it is those with the most simplistic views and arguments that get heard first.

I hope that gives a little food for thought.

Peace.

2006-08-17 01:57:05 · answer #6 · answered by Mr X 2 · 1 1

because the 2000 vote was close, and Gore made a big deal of it....most of their arguments come from the stealing of the election, and the fact is, it was not......recounts, showed that Bush actually had a few hundred more votes in Florida {Time-Warner; New York Times recount}...They blame the supreme court for giving him the vote...Most on the Supreme court at that time were Libs, and they never actually said anything but it was Florida law, and not a Federal law.......so, they just hate losing, and facts.....Libs hate the truth, if it is not what they want it to be

2006-08-17 02:19:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It is a hard time for the United States, and for better or worse, George W. Bush has made many controversial decisions. Only time will tell if they are right or wrong, I'd like to think they are right. But until we know for sure, skeptics of the administration will use the controversy to complain, with Bush as the scapegoat.

2006-08-17 01:57:59 · answer #8 · answered by airforceterp330 3 · 0 1

I think it has gone beyond a "left and right" thing. It is knowing right from wrong. If you would have an open mind to the issues at hand and how he has handled them and his destructive ways, you would be one of thousands who are disagreeing with Bush, many of them being highly note able "right wingers". "The needs of the many out way the needs of the few" He has let Americans down in so many ways, it has gone beyond a hate issues, this administration has disappointed America along with embarrassed us.

2006-08-17 01:59:13 · answer #9 · answered by starchild_kisschild 3 · 0 0

He took a balanced budget, and turned it into a sea of debt and deficits.

He took a secular Muslim country, and handed control of it over to Iran-friendly Shiites, while training a generation of Iraqis to hate America and to learn how to be killers and future terrorists.

He has slowed scientific progress, both with his attitude of ignorance (such as proclaiming he wasn't sure about evolution), and with his actions, such as banning stem cell research.

He has ignored global warming.

He has proposed amending the Constitution in order to institutionalize his bigotry against homosexuals.

Lord, this list could take a year....but you get the idea....

See, Shiraz, this list contains actual facts instead of just wild, inaccurate accusations and assumptions. You should try it some time.....

2006-08-17 02:00:49 · answer #10 · answered by lamoviemaven 3 · 1 1

To this "administration" and its inflated army of butt-plugs, anybody to the left of Idi Amin or Genghis Khan is a liberal. Mussolini and de Franco would be considered moderates and they wouldn't be invited to anybody's Power Lunches anymore unless they needed to "borrow" a Token Liberal to sway a few votes.

2006-08-17 01:59:29 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers