English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

14 answers

Yes i do cause he was champions league top goal scorer for the 1998-1999, 2000-2001 and 2005-2006 seasons. He got Uefa best forward in 1999 and 2006 and won the Ballon d'or in 2004. He scored 268 goals from 463 games at club level and has scored 31 goals from 69 games for the Ukraine.

2006-08-17 06:18:08 · answer #1 · answered by brianstein2005 2 · 0 0

Shouldn't you actually give him a chance to play in the premiership first? Let's face it, Terry 'enry's been here for years, he's used to the pace of the English game and everything. He's got better cos of the time he's spent here. Shev may also get better with the time that he spends here, or could just end up like all of the recent Chelski forwards, and do nothing!

2006-08-16 23:40:55 · answer #2 · answered by brighty642002 2 · 0 0

No.

Adriano, ballack, ronaldinho, Ibrahimovic, and a few more are better.

Shevchenko is probably the best finisher in the world but not an all round player. He will score lots of goals, but won't help out in midfield ect.

Sorry I thought you said soccer player.


As for scoring goals then yes you are correct.... but adriano runs him close.

2006-08-16 23:38:40 · answer #3 · answered by Moses_Santos_ii 2 · 0 0

I like the way Van Nistleroy plays, he's the closest thing to Ian Rush since Ian Rush. Stick the ball in the box and you know he'll be on the end of it.

Liverpool fan.

2006-08-17 00:06:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No. He is behind Henry and Ronaldinho. Did you ever see Shevchenko in an advertisement? Some people say he has no juggling skills.

2006-08-16 23:55:37 · answer #5 · answered by azfarsyah 1 · 0 0

i wouldnt call him THE best but certainly one of the best. however, i still think he was better in milan and should consider leaving chelsea.

2006-08-17 03:26:07 · answer #6 · answered by Lola P 6 · 0 0

no because hes at chelsea

2006-08-17 02:09:01 · answer #7 · answered by Toomg 4 · 0 0

hez 2nd
henry is 1st

2006-08-16 23:38:32 · answer #8 · answered by Stevie-G 4 · 0 0

not the best, but among the best...

2006-08-17 00:36:38 · answer #9 · answered by Dorsen 2 · 0 0

henry Ballack then him!.

2006-08-16 23:41:49 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers