I am not circumsised.
Also, i am not going to be biased towards it.... but I only believe in getting it cut (circumsised) only if sex is VERY painful and you cannot stretch the foreskin any more by other 'stretching techniques'.
I dont think we are in a place where circumsition should be done otherwise mentioned above. Some people say it better for hygeine but i disagree. The foreskin has a purpose.... otherwise we wouldnt have it in the first place.
Circumsition in the past was really designed to stop boys masturbating in their younger days. Today, we know that even getting it cut wouldnt stop it, but that was really the main reason for it.
The only other importance of circumsition refers to certain religions. Also, America for example doesnt seem to understand the pinciples and knowledge of the foreskin, and new born babies will get the chop, sometimes without the parents agreeing.
Today, there really is no straight up facts to getting the chop unless you have medical issues with your uncut penis. However, say for example you suffer from phimosis (tight foreskin), the chop is not the only answer as some people and doctors claim.
My advice is to leave the penis as it is.... if you had really big issues having sex, and other methods do not work, then maybe a circumsition is something to think about anyway. Otherwise, I beleive an uncut penis is better than a cut one..... and it is more pleasurable also.
These sites I found very educational and gives good options apart from circumsition ---- asumming you have issues with the foreskin.... making circumsition NOT the only answer.
More detail of the foreskin
http://www.norm-uk.org/function.html
Problems with the foreskin.... and solutions to this...
http://www.embarrassingproblems.co.uk/penistight.htm
http://www.norm-uk.org/circumcision_alternative_treatments.html#219
http://www.norm-uk.org/phimosis_clinical_guidelines.html#315
All the best
Everyone has their own opinion, and this is mine.
2006-08-16 23:06:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by The Avenger 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Its better to get opened and not circumsized. Dont make a releigious issue. Its just matter of hygiene only if u wash daily by removing your foreskin you need not to bother with that .
2006-08-16 22:45:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by vinod k 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I like mine the way it is, so not. Never had any issues/problems, don't intend to. It's really easy to keep clean so that's not an issue. If it's not broken, don't fix it, bad things can happen.
2006-08-17 02:04:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by trebla_5 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Circumcision,it will be a lot easier to take care of.Less chance of infections too.But your choice.
2006-08-16 22:28:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by Pisces 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
its really an opinion. But I say better to be circumsized
2006-08-17 02:02:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by popgoestheweasel 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i say its better for the guy cos its cleaner but then u could lose a slight sentation of sex..
2006-08-16 22:25:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I am circumcised and love it as it is cleaner
2006-08-17 14:04:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, foreskin is trendy recent year.
Girl love that
2006-08-16 22:27:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by Notorious Guy 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Way better, uncircumcised is GROSS !!
2006-08-16 22:26:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
not
2006-08-16 22:25:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by gallow 5
·
0⤊
1⤋