2006-08-16 20:45:39 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Books & Authors
I'm just concerned about all those new planets that have now qualified as planets.
I mean, either all the astrological charts done in the past have been wrong, because they haven't included these lumps of rock in their calculations, or only some distant lumps of rock guide my life and not others.
Now why would that be? Is it because the whole idea is total rubbish?
2006-08-16 20:53:12 · answer #1 · answered by scotsman 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I have read Linda Goodman and many other writers on astrology. I find her just OK. There are however many authors in India who are more accurate. For example Bejan Daruwala. Try him and then observe yourself.
2006-08-16 20:55:02 · answer #2 · answered by Ashok Pipal (India) 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Books via Liz Greene are greater tricky than the greater nicely consumer-friendly ones via Linda Goodman. they are good for somebody who has greater adventure with charts. a competent one to your uncle is approximately Saturn- i won't be ready to submit to in techniques the call, yet provided that he is going by using a Saturn cycle real now it relatively is enormously effective to him. i think of its called a sparkling look at an previous devil. yet only ask for books via Liz Greene and the single with Saturn interior the call.
2016-12-11 10:15:34 · answer #3 · answered by mundell 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are other, better astrologer/writers....Susan Miller for one.
2006-08-17 00:03:50 · answer #4 · answered by Jessie P 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good reading material id say. Somehow cant take her too seriously though.
2006-08-17 01:21:55 · answer #5 · answered by Sumi 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
one of the planet same name as my daughter Veena
2006-08-18 22:37:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋