The Bristish National Party on the surface seems a like white supremisict group. They are "committed to stemming and reversing the tide of non-white immigration and to restoring, by legal changes, negotiation and consent the overwhelmingly white makeup of the British population that existed in Britain prior to 1948".
I was shocked to discover a political party that so what resembled the Nazis party in this day and age in a country like Britain. They claim they are not racists but "realists". This sort of rationalization of racism, where one group justifying being racists as natural, has been witnessed thoughout histroy and is very dangerous. However, the BNP is finding success recently in local elections in the constituency of Barking and Dagenham and their policies are gaining significant support in polls.
Maybe I'm wrong and this groups is just defending rights for whites just as blacks had to defend theirs.
Is the BNP racists or are they just defendng the rights of whites?
2006-08-16 18:30:56 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It's a challenging situation in Europe and England. There are many cultures mixing and some of it really causes unrest at times.
I don't think they're going about it the right way. It sounds clearly racist. It would be difficult to single out a culture too. And what would you call that 'culturalism." I don't know. The goal to be justified, would have to be one of protecting the English legal system from religious or cultural radicals bent on changing the country for their benefit. A coup by democracy if you will.
I think these people are likely just racist though.
2006-08-16 18:38:04 · answer #1 · answered by BigPappa 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
The British do not favor to blend faith and politics particularly than reality Christianity is way less prevalent than the BNP. The BNP is very solid at getting at those those who've a situation with immigration. also what what became the finally end up like? maximum folk do not hardship to vote in via-elections so it truly is not that representative. Apathy is more beneficial indicative of what the inhabitants experience about politics than both the BNP or Christian party.
2016-11-04 23:59:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think you would like to look at the individual to see if they are racist. But the group in general is wrong. Anytime you are excluding a group based on color of skin, it shows ignorance and fear.
2006-08-16 18:34:42 · answer #3 · answered by JT 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course they are racists. Their policy is bases on white vs. non-white. It is not based on values, religion, economics, social class, nationality etc. The question is..."Is racism wrong, dangerous or ultimately unhelpful?" I think that the answer to all three is yes. Consequently, I think it ultimately undermines all our rights when we deny rights based on race. That's my two cents worth.
2006-08-16 18:37:19 · answer #4 · answered by optionseeker1989 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Sounds to me they're just trying to get rid of the shitstains that are mooching off your system.
Why do you say it only means they're taking out only non-whites?
I don't think that's really what is happening.
2006-08-16 18:35:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The problem isn't pigmentation, you dumb ****. The problem there as it is here is, documentation. Any country has the right to know who is living among them and expel those who enter them illegally.
But keep playing the race card if it makes you happy, you schmuck! The more you use it the weaker it gets.
2006-08-16 19:12:41 · answer #6 · answered by caesar x 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Is it possible to piss on me and tell me it's rain
2006-08-17 06:13:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋