How come the Repub. spent time and money finding out if Clinton had sex and nothing clarifying 9-11?

Answer 1

Excuse me...

Clinton was investigated by his own Justice Department. Ken Starr was appointed by Janet Reno.

9-11 not clarified? Hello!!! ever hear of the 9-11 COMMISION?

Answer 2

You know I've wondered this question myself, why a man who lead this country to war under false pretenses (isn't that what they accused Hitler of?) is not just not investigated but still supported by his followers!? The only answer I can give you is that the Republican's under Rove and Cheney are very good, who else would have the indecencconly to claim if it was under the other guys watch, we ARE going to get attacked again. As if they won't try regardless of which party is in control.

But the real reason is probably because they rule both the House, the Senate, to some degree the Supreme Court and the Executive Branch. Since they control the government in it's entirety as well as the media, any request for impeachment or investigations will be for show at best. God Bless America,we need it.

Answer 3

You really need to stop blaming the Republicans for everything, including 9/11.

The Republicans at least have the political decency not to blame the Democrats, who were in charge of the nation for the 8 consecutive years leading up to 9.11.2001, for the attacks on this country, which were performed by Al-Qaeda operatives.

"It happened on Bush's watch"

If I sell you a car, and a week later the engine dies, don't you blame me for selling you a bad car? I can't claim, well, "it happened on your watch".

The Republicans, in spite of the facts, do not blame the Dems for 9/11, they blame the terrorists who conspired to cause it.

Maybe you should grow up and do the same thing. Maybe then, people like you and I, who have political differences, could actually sit down and have an intelligent conversation about the future of America, instead of having heated discussions that go nowhere and are conducted on a level that would shame kindergarteners.

By the way... the 9/11 bogus Commission report found out the cause of 9/11 but covered it up. See: Able Danger

The Republicans did not want a "bipartisan commission" to do the role of Congress for this very reason: the Congressmen and women who were ultimately responsible for the problems which stopped the FBI from preventing 9/11 were on the Commission to determine it's cause. That is a conflict of interest, and the primary reason why the real facts about 9/11 are not made public today.

The guilty party consists of both Republicans and Democrats.

Can you fathom that? Or are you blinded by useless partisanship like the rest of politically illiterate America?

This kind of discussion tests my faith in the future of democracy, and freedom itself.

Answer 4

i do not discover that to be actual... even inspite of the undeniable fact that, i'm constructive they spent a daft quantity of money on a topic remember meant for giant call mag. in my view i do not care about that. Clinton grow to be a good President, and that i'd pick him back.... he's human for god sake! We elected a president, no longer a boy scout! we are at present spending 12 billion funds a month on the conflict adversarial to terrorism.... the activities of 9/11 have sparked this conflict even inspite of the undeniable fact that i have self assurance that has been lost in the midst of issues.... such issues as oil as an get at the same time... or the enlargement of economic entrepreneurs, like Wal-mart in Iraq.... likewise...... the quest to dig up airborne dirt and dust on President Clinton wasn't an honorable quest... he grow to be nevertheless an rather good President inspite of his affair... in case you actually imagine about it, an rather good type of our Presidents were in charge of such issues. so some distance as bill and Al Gore no longer attesting.... i imagine they likely recognize something that a President pick might want to recognize that the well-known public doesn't so some distance because the 9/11 attacks are in touch, yet i imagine Bush has a lot more effective to do with this than Clinton it really is merely my opinion... thanks for posting tremendous questions as continually

Answer 5

THANK YOU! Damn good question! Unfortunately...you'll just get a lot of ignorant answers from bitter Bush supporters - who will just blame 9/11 on Clinton instead of answering your question. Which proves that they have no answer to this.

Oh...and here's a little tidbit. When 9/11 occurred both houses were not controlled by Republicans. Both houses requested to have their own investigation. Bush and Cheney would not allow this. Instead they insisted on a bipartisan committee filled with too many egos to get the job done correctly. Furthermore, they insisted on hand picking the chairmen. They didn't provide the information that the Committee requested - they held up all the responses they did give. And.....they lied....it's now come out that the committee members know that the Pentagon and others lied in their testimony.

Answer 6

The Re publican's could not stand Clinton he was smart and successful and deflecting all the bull they threw at him. So that left one attack and that was his skirt chasing.
He fell right into the trap he should have said no comment instead of denying the affair. Then again he was not the first or the last president to have sexual relations in the white house.
But he the first president that almost got impeached for having and affair.
I feel sorry for Hillary she did not deserve to hear about her husband's affair the way she did he lied so did other presidents about the people's business Clinton lied about what some chick did to him under a desk.
Clinton has to answer to God not me or anyone else about his affair but he and other Presidents need to answer to us (American Citizens) about the business of this country.
What is admirable is after all that money they wasted trying to impeach him we still had a surplus and one terrorist attack before he left office in Yemen.
Now all I can do is hope Bush finds a way to get Osma Bin Ladden in Iraq oh my bad Afghanistan or is it Pakistan no is it Iran?
Wherever he is I think he will be there until 2008 that saddens and scares me.

Answer 7

Clinton was not impeached for having sex with an intern (although that would be considered unethical in many companies). He was impeached for lying about it to the grand jury. He was also disbarred. The Muslim radicals attacked us now we are trying to get as many of them as we can. Clear enough for you? Probably not... Oh well.

P.S. Jay S (Below) is right about the investigation. Good catch Jay, the Libs bend the truth so much I get numb and sometimes miss the lies.

Answer 8

What's to clarify about 9-11?

We saw it on many different TV channels and the debris is still available in New York.

What more do we want? What more do we need? Are you so hard to please?

About Wee Willie Weeny, apparently he is a more interesting subject for the mob of do-dos who like that stuff-- and the newspapers and TV folks enjoy publishing it.

Which is why you see more of that than of the other.

Answer 9

Let me see they had a 911 commission and what is thier to clarify about 911 besides alot of internet bull and lies.

Terrorist forced planes to crash into buildings, that is about as plain and easy to understand as it gets.

These terrrorist were know but our laws don't allow us to stop people before they do a crime, we knew of some plot but not the details, since of course we can't use real torture ( and putting underwear on someones head and making them go around naked and letting a dog bark at them is not torture it is college faternity on a saturday night.

So in general we did investigate 911 and are trying to find more terrorist before they do more.

Answer 10

lol, does that tell you what a joke this country is? All the republicans care about is gaining and retaining power and control over everything in this country. If they clarify 9-11, how will they ever justify the war in Iraq?