Two main reasons --
1. At the first instant of the Big Bang there was no mass, just energy.
2. Just after the Big Bang event, the space of the universe expanded faster than the speed of light for a short time (..no this doesn't violate relativity because the velocity of space isn't limited by that)
2006-08-16 17:59:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by Chug-a-Lug 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Before the big bang, there is no guarantee that the laws of physics we know today even apply. Before the big bang, there is no indication there was a "huge mass." In fact, to the contrary, just after the BB, theory has it there was little mass at all; it was all energy. So before the BB, perhaps there was a huge well of energy and not mass. Mass, as we know it, did not begin to fall out of the BB until after the universe began to cool.
But to a point, I've read some pieces suggesting the entire observable universe is nothing more or less than the event horizon of a gigantic black hole. This is not a universally accepted notion, but some noted astrophysicists have entertained that idea. For example,
Quantum black hole inflation
M.B.Altaie
Dept. of Physics, Yarmouk University, 21163 Irbid-Jordan
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/gr-qc/pdf/0105/0105024.pdf
"the universe may have been born as a black hole and is still is. This idea is not new, and there are a number of investigations that support it; for example it was already shown long ago by Oppenheimer and Snyder [24] that the inside of the chwartzchild solution could be a Friedmann universe. ... "
2006-08-16 17:32:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by oldprof 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Before the big bang the universe was theorized to exist as just pure energy (which granted is convertible to mass, but you know what I mean).
Last thing I saw about it was that "some quantum fluctuation" occured that caused the bang, where the energy became more spread out and "cooled" into mass.
2006-08-16 17:06:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i've got continuously concept that god began the super bang. Scientists examining the super bang concept comprehend what handed off after yet no person rather is time-honored with what began it. i think of the introduction tale became into purely made to describe to those who did no longer have on the instant's awareness of the scientific international.
2016-10-02 04:39:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
A very good question, and at this point nobody knows. That's waaay out on the fringes of known physics.
2006-08-16 17:06:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
the energy was not great enough to create a black hole
2006-08-16 17:05:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by wizard 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
I don't believe in the big bang theory
2006-08-16 17:05:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by ♥M.a.s.q.u.e.r.a.d.e.™ 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
because the universe expanded faster than it could collapse on its own gravity
2006-08-17 11:20:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by ShiningCrimson 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
you really expect someone to answer this?
2006-08-16 17:04:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Not enough fuse...
2006-08-16 17:04:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋