Hezbollah falls under the definition of the FBI as a terrorist organization:
FBI definitions of Terrorism:
There is no single, universally accepted, definition of terrorism. Terrorism is defined
in the Code of Federal Regulations as “...the unlawful use of force and violence against
persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or
any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.” (28 C.F.R.
Section 0.85)
i
FBI POLICY
AND
GUIDELINES
nnn accordance with U.S. counterterrorism
nnpolicy, the FBI considers terrorists to be criminals.
FBI efforts in countering terrorist threats are
multifaceted. Information obtained through FBI
investigations is analyzed and used to prevent
terrorist activity and, whenever possible, to effect the
arrest and prosecution of potential perpetrators.
FBI investigations are initiated in accordance with the
following guidelines:
I
The FBI further describes terrorism as either domestic or international, depending
on the origin, base, and objectives of the terrorists. For purposes of this report, the
FBI will use the following definitions:
Domestic terrorism is the unlawful use, or threatened use, of force or violence by
a group or individual based and operating entirely within the United States or its
territories without foreign direction committed against persons or property to intimidate
or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in
furtherance of political or social objectives.
International terrorism involves violent acts or acts dangerous to human life that
are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or any state, or that would
be a criminal violation if committed within the jurisdiction of the United States or
any state. These acts appear to be intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population,
influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion, or affect
the conduct of a government by assassination or kidnapping. International terrorist
acts occur outside the United States or transcend national boundaries in terms of
the means by which they are accomplished, the persons they appear intended to
coerce or intimidate, or the locale in which the perpetrators operate or seek asylum.
2006-08-16 16:35:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
The categorization of Hesbollah as a Terrorist Organization is no more than a US and Zionist propaganda charge that is supposed to affect the significant minority in the USA and Britain that are not capable of thinking for themselves and are reliant on skewed News reports for information.
The rest of us are fully aware that Hesbollah is a Freedom Fighting, Social, and Political force that protects the rights of, initially the significant Shi-ittie population, and laterly all the peoples of Lebanon. Quite Rightly they have to have their funding from somewhere and Iran, predominantly, and Syria have provided this. Israel after all get funded by the US and have all their military requirements met by the US and Britain.
George Galloway is a man of high principles, and his vociferous campaign against our bullying tactics against the people of the Middle East have already brought him infront of the US Senate Commission. Their Crass efforts to discredit him was met with the same vitriol with which he dispensed of this interviewer. He however ceeded that the Zionist stranglehold on the world through the USA is unchallengeable.
2006-08-16 16:58:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hezbollah is not any diverse than the insurgents in Iraq. they are distant places brokers from different usa's who've entered Lebanon for the purpose of destroying the Lebanese government. The assaults on Israel have been meant to reason conflict between Lebanon and Israel. This slime (Hezbollah) replaced into so reason on doing so as that they intentionally placed their missile launchers, artillery, mortars, and different offensive weapons among the quite populated aspects of Lebanon, understanding that if Israel defended itself it would reason a extensive quantity of collateral injury. particular, it rather is terrorism of the backside style, and that spells Syria+ Iran = Hezbollah! Hezbollah's methods failed and Lebanon and Israel the two understand the actual enemy to be Hezbollah. Now, Hezbollah remains attempting to stress the duly elected government of Lebanon via staging super crowds of sympathizers and take a seat-ins in an attempt to get the government in Beirut to step down. it rather is not susceptible to take place and Hezbollah will as quickly as lower back slither lower back to Damascus for brand spanking new orders and a clean approach. Or, possibly they'll in basic terms pass abode!
2016-09-29 08:47:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
no not really ...the old saying is true a terrorist is really a point of view from where you are . im going to sum this up small ..... Israel was formed in 1948 and every arab in the middle east was against them ...today, every arab in the middle east wants to destroy them still. You can make all kinds of arguments about who killed who and who is justified in doing it but its a pointless exercize. You could argue that the united states was formed illegally from england also with this line of thinking ..... the bottom line is that the US is here to stay and so is israel .... anyone that is against either one is on the "watch" list and if one of these groups arms themselves to the teeth and acts agressively towards us or the israelis they are going to get themselves bombed and killed ....thats the reality of it .... you can sit there and whine about why you dont like it all day long but if you have an enemy you are going to take the steps necessary to ensure that enemy does not get to strong and you will definitely hit them hard if they attack you ..... so dont try to make a case about who stuck first and who deserves what because it has no bearing on reality .... hezbolla is the enemy of israel admittedly and israel will take whatever steps it deems necessary to control the threat whether its occupying or bombing them into a parking lot..... as long as they are aggressive to israel they deserve anything they get terrorist or not.
2006-08-16 16:50:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
And where does the money come from? Try Iran which is a state run by terrorists essentially. They supply Hezbollah with weapons, missles and the like while at the same time giving them money to help build a terrorist infrastructure in Lebanon. If you like the damned raghead camel jockey terrorists so much, why don't you convert to Isalm and move over there? Maybe you can even join al Qaeda.
2006-08-16 16:35:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Way to go dude. What a amazing clip. What else is there to say. Great job finding that and I will be sending it to everyone I know and getting them to do the same to wake up all the conservative TV zombies occupying the USA.
2006-08-16 16:46:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by chadman 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
terrorist
adj : characteristic of someone who employs terrorism (especially as a political weapon); "terrorist activity"; "terrorist state" n : a radical who employs terror as a political weapon; usually organizes with other terrorists in small cells; often uses religion as a cover for terrorist activities
Yes, Hezbollah is....and Galloway is an anti-Semite, and has been for over 30 years....well known fact
2006-08-16 16:43:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
What word would you prefer to use: rogue organization of concern?
They fire rockets at civilian villages and cities, for no other purpose than to cause harm to civilians.
If you prefer to just refer to them as criminal, rather than terrorist, that's fine with me.
2006-08-16 16:38:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by coragryph 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Not really.
2006-08-16 16:36:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by Pseudo Obscure 6
·
0⤊
2⤋