Simple Question for liberals. What is the profile of a typical suicide bomber?

Question

Is it a Black christian elderly woman? What about a young chinese boy? A Jewish Rabbi? What about a young white female? A Japanese cook? A Hindu?

OR COULD IT BE A MUSLIM? A MUSLIM?

Why are liberals so politically correct that they would rather not offend a people that are SO OFFENSIVE and INTOLERANT of others? In the end, what do the liberals think that playing nice games with Islamofascists will get them? Anyone?

I know I'll be called a racist, a fascist, a bigot by some, while there are those that are planning for mass murders. These that plan for mass murder are given a free pass by the same that call me those names.

When was the last time you heard a die-hard liberal criticize the enemy? Then, when was the last time you heard liberals criticize America and our military? Whose side are liberals on, anyway?

Something to think about.

Notice the attacks on me, but they fail to condemn those that would hang their head from a bridge in a whim!

LIBERALISM IS A MENTAL DISORDER.

Corygryph, you should really keep a low profile. Word is getting out that you don't have much horse sense.

It is indeed amazing that corygryph says that not all Muslims are terrorists, yet claims in "his" profile, 'highly religious'. Do you mean Hindus and Buddhists too? Get some lube to get that head out of your large intestine, liberal.

Answer 1

For once John Skerry I agree with you. We should not appease the politically correct forces of this country, in trying to whitewash the Muslim community, to make it appear as if nothing inherent in their culture or theology makes their ilk more inclined towards terror than others. I will even concede to your generalization that most liberals in fact foster this proclivity to separate Islam from terrorist ideology, when in fact there is good justification for violence in the teachings of their faith and in the mindset of their culture.

With that said, it is a bit hypocritical to place the blame for the sanitation of Islamic terrorists just squarely on the shoulders of liberals. After all, it would appear that given conservative’s control over three branches of government, that they could do more to underscore the role Muslims, and their religion, play in terrorism. Yet what do they do with such unmitigated power to sway the minds and hearts of the world?

Well, you have president George W. Bush, the most high profile conservative leader in the country, repeatedly telling people that Islam is a religion of peace, and that terrorists have merely hijacked the religion. You have his administration making friends with the Saudi Government, literally holding hands and kissing them, all for the sake of preserving profitable business relationships, even though Saudi Arabia is known to be one of the biggest financial contributors to terrorist movements, and produced most of the 9/11 hijackers. You have our “great” conservative President make alliances with Pakistan, a place that has become a refuge for Al Qaeda, the Taliban, and possibly Osama Bin Laden. Not to mention that Pakistan is were all the bombers of the subway attack in London and latest airplane sabotage attempt came from. Furthermore, both Saudi Arabia and Pakistan are currently run by despotic regimes that do not answer to an electoral body, and therefore disregard the value of people’s opinions and the democratic process. Even with the terrorist issue aside, it is a bit hypocritical for the President to laud the virtues of freedom and democracy and then become bedfellows with two of the most tyrannical regimes in recent history; with Saudi Arabia reducing women to the level of cattle, something this administration ostracized the Taliban about.

Most recently you have Condoleeza Rice pressing Israel into a ceasefire that essentially signifies Hezbollah’s victory over Israel. In essence Bush’s conservative secretary of state contributed to the successful campaign of a terrorist entity over that of a democratic ally. As result, this so called “hawkish” conservative administration has set off a chain of events that emboldens our enemies and galvanizes the Muslim people. The conservative leadership in this country has sent a loud and clear message to the Muslim world that your militant actions will be rewarded with democratic nations capitulating to your every whim.

With all the ways in which conservatives have made explicit and implicit overtures to the Islamic thugs, you have the gall to think that it is only the liberals who are in cahoots with Muslims. Ifthere is anyone who is bowing down like a submissive little slave girl to the Islamic onslaught, it is the conservatives, who would rather preserve their corporate dominance, instead of defending the American people. Much like a good prostitute, you conservatives are willing to bend over and get violated as long as you get paid for it.

Answer 2

Just because a person is a Muslim does not make him a suicide bomber Was Timothy McVay a Muslim? Think about it" Was Gacy or Bundy who were Mass murders Muslim? Hell no! So it goes to show that your trying to profile Muslims as terrorists & mass murderers does not always hold true. As far as lberals critising our milatary you are full of it What they have been critizieing is that idiot Bush andf his insane policies that are not working, As for whiose side the liberals are on it is the side of the average American Not the filthly rich tat have breen making a killing off of the governent contracts because of Bushes forgiejn policy

Answer 3

The typical profile:

Highly religious. Closed-minded. Determined that his beliefs are the only valid ones. Known to spout canned rhetoric in response to every statement or question. Intolerant of differences. More concerned with hurting people than solving problems. Full of hatred.

Hmmmm... wait. I'm seeing a pattern here. Wait. What's that Skerry has in his hand?

{EDIT} Skerry, what people choose to think about me and my ideas is up to them. Unlike you, I respect people's right to their opinion, whether they agree with me or not. The point is to actually have an opinion on the merits of an issue, rather than just spouting mindless rhetoric.

But we've had this conversation before about hate-filled speech before. I understand that it's hard for you to remember such things, because the fangs must cause some terrible frothing at the mouth. But don't worry, it'll be ok. Just remember not to swallow.

Answer 4

You are absolutely right! Try as I may, I truly do not understand this way of thinking. The snide remarks are a bit ridiculous also.

It seems to me that anyone who has the privilege to live in the United States (lord knows there are hundreds of illegals trying to come here right this minute so it must not be that bad) the least they could do is speak semi-kindly about our population as a whole and at the very least, kindly of our brave men and women who are out there, fighting for our freedoms here.

If I were a target of "profiling", I firmly believe that I would not only put up with it but I welcome it because it would mean to me that this terrorist threat is being treated as a real problem. And if the people of the Muslim community have nothing to hide, then it seems to me that those people would also welcome profiling so they could show the world that not all Muslims are Islamofacist's who want to see us dead.

Answer 5

The last time I checked, the "conservatives" were in power and could enact racial/religious screening if they so desired. Of course, that doesn't help if the terrorists recruit native born folks who are no distinguishable from the general population. Which is what they are doing.

Answer 6

Thank you for not asking a "politically correct" qestion
Q: Who wants to destroy us?
A: Some extreme fanatical Muslims (not all muslims mind you, but some)
Is that racist?
You tell me

Answer 7

I think you already know the answers to your own question considering that the muslim religious extremists in the US are conservative republican not liberal democrat.

Answer 8

A typical suicide bomber:A fundamentalist like Pat Robertson, or someone like Rumsfield.

Republican yes or yes. If not you are a Muslim, fascist comunist, liberal, etc.

Answer 9

I'm a liberal - and I have no problem with the idea of creating a different line at the airport for people of arab descent. That doesn't mean that I think all arabs are terrorists, but the terrorists that are threatening us are arabs.....so it makes sense to me. It's just more efficient.

Answer 10

Liberals ar liberated republicans are republicinated.

One Time I went to a republican orgy and they were very conservative as to what they wanted to do with me

i went to a liberal orgy and all they did is whine and cry without any alternatives or new ideas

The republicans knew a real woman when they had one

liberals complained about my horse face and eyebrows

republicans noticed that a hole is a hole either way you look at it


I hope my answer helps your question as I am always trying to be helpful to our president reagan who is fighting the kurds so we dont have to fight them here in utah