What will convince the liberals that Islamofascism is real? The lib zombies exonerate and sleep w/ the enemy?

Question

Do liberals live in a fantasy world? Do they honestly realize that if they play nice that the Muslims won't treat them like Nick Berg or the Ethiopians? Honestly, why are liberals so stupid?

Stupid and naive. What's the next conspiracy theory to defend Islamofascism, liberals? Bush is guilty for terrorist attacks from 1940?

Get your head out of your *** if you can. I know it's up there really far. Try really hard. Lube might help you.

Corygraph, you go ahead and explain that when, God forbid, a Muslim has a knife at your throat. Maybe you'll see the light then? I doubt it.

Answer 1

Nothing will convince them , just look at how fast they named a mental anxiety for themselves after President Bush was reelected

Dozens more Kerry supporters flock to Florida therapists
American Health Association reacts with free ‘post-election selection trauma’ counseling

Answer 2

Well, for start some evidence that Islamic organizations are attempting to establish fascist regimes. Look at the definition of the word (that is, if you can actually be bothered to read something that isn't pure hate-filled drivel). Fascism: a right-wing authoritarian hierarchical government, opposed to liberalism and democracy.

Terrorists are trying to topple governments, not to establish them. So the term fascist doesn't really apply. Not that accuracy in language appears to be something you care about. But we'll let that go.

Second, just because some small number of people are terrorists, doesn't mean that the entire religion is. It would be like blaming all of Christianity for the actions of the IRA or the KKK. Not that rational distinctions have ever meant much to you either. But we'll let that one go as well.

Third, liberals fully believe in terrorists. And they believe in fascists. So, your claim that they don't think fascists are real, or that they don't think terrorists are real, is not only spurious but objectively inane. Not that factual accuracy is something you strive for, because factual accuracy tends to cut against irrational hatred.


They just don't always agree with some of the proposed solutions, like spending tens of billions of dollars and losing thousands of American troops babysitting countries that have been going through a civil war. They just think there are better solutions, that don't cost quite as many American lives and that will actually produce better long term results, here and abroad.

But then again, actually attempting to find solutions to problems, rather than just spewing hatred, is something that seems to utterly elude you. That one I don't we'll just let go.

Answer 3

What will convince neoconservatives that not all Muslims are terrorists (by the way, can you actually define Islamofascism? Without checking?)?

What will convince them that not agreeing with something that they say does not make one a lover of terrorism?

Will you actually do anything other than dismiss arguments against you as naïve?

Answer 4

Calling them islamofascists is a way to rouse the rabble, get folks excited. I always thought fascism was a form of government and that it involved a lot of corporatism - I do not see that here. The terrorists are definitely bad guys but I don't think calling them a scary name helps anybody.

Answer 5

well if pres bushwacker had not invaded iraq we wouldnt have now a training camp for would be terrorists!! sleeping with the enemy ???? tell georgie boy,he should stop being such a BUTT MUNCH when it comes to the saudis.do you consider all muslims to be your enemy ? or is that the line that bush and cheney keep feeding you ?

Answer 6

Guess what? There are some bad people out there in the world who would like to hurt us but I'm not afraid. I know I'm about 1000 times more likely to get hurt or killed by some moron who's driving and talking on his cellphone than by some desperate, violent religious zealot who's trying to kill people in terrorist attacks--which are really just bloody, suicidal publicity stunts.

I'll say it again--I'm not afraid.

People like you can't make me scared or spread their fear to me. I'll give up some convenience for additional security but that's the only thing I'll give up. I don't have a patriotic duty to give up my rights or my senses... in fact Americans have a patriotic duty to keep both.

These people are a credible threat in some ways--they would certainly like to pull another 911 if they could. But if we're on our toes and our counter-terrorism, intelligence and law enforcement communities are properly supported and allowed to do their jobs--within the law--I don't think they will get too far. Having better relations with the rest of the civilized world would go a long way towards that too.

The real truth is that these stateless Muslim extremists present no credible military threat to us today at all. If they did they wouldn't have to resort to blowing themselves up. They'd love to know they've managed to get you this upset though. It means their terror campaigns are having the intended effect.

And I don't embrace propaganda buzzwords like 'Islamofascism' even if they do have some small kernel of truth to them. There have been repressive theocratic governments and religious movements around for a long time but as far as I know this word got dropped a couple of weeks ago and now all you guys are saying it. That word doesn't have whatever power over me that it seems to have over you.

What is your solution to this problem of Islamist extremism exactly anyway? Is this question about staying in Iraq? How does that make us more or less safe than we are now? Honestly, how does it benefit us? Don't you think that 300 Billion dollars could have been better spent domestically? Border security, cargo search capability, more air marshals, better detection equipment--are you going to tell me we couldn't have done all these things and more with that money?

Do you think we would have been hit by another terrorist attack almost as bad as 911 if we had not gone to Iraq? That attack would have had to been pretty bad to cost us more lives and pain than the war in Iraq has. We're up to 2600 American servicemen dead and almost 9000 seriously wounded. I don't believe we would have seen any attack on American soil that would have taken this kind of toll... and I don't believe Iraq has made any positive impact on our national security whatsoever. It's just hurt us by draining our economy, creating a violent extremist hotbed in Iraq and making a spectacular recruitment booster for the forces of Islamic extremism.

Are you hoping that we'll just kill all the terrorists and extremists in a war of attrition if we stay over there? That's just not going to happen. There are a billion Muslims in the world. Their autocratic governments and lousy economies along with the history of conflict with the West and our aggressive foreign policy can assure us that there will be a nice steady stream from that billion people who are going to become desperate extremists who express themselves through violence.

That doesn't mean we need to appease them... but we've got to change from the plan we're using now. We're just poking a hornets nest with a stick. Your fear-mongering and vague intimations that genocide is the answer won't help America deal any better. You should get constructive or pack it up. At least stop being scared.

BTW your old avatar was better in my opinion...

EDIT: You changed it again! You must spend a lot of time finding Kerry pictures and messing with them in MSpaint! The forked tongue is very nice... I honestly think this new one is your best yet. I don't think too much of your thinking or your writing but you've definitely got a talent for making 'devil Kerry' pictures.

Answer 7

Well if they irradiate a major city or half of a state. The libs. might get the point, but I doubt they would. The libs want to talk to the people that want to kill them. If that does not work, they will talk some more. Then if that doesn't work, they will blame us for what we did or didn't do whichever fits.

Answer 8

Well, if a lib is captured and DOES indeed lose his head to a terrorist's blade, will that liberal even miss it? Apparently he/she didn't use it much anyway.

Answer 9

I don't know if liberals live in the fantasy world. Dubya (actually people around him) needs better lies to persuade people. That's real.

Answer 10

The smurfs think all Mideastern people smoke a hookah and watch belly dancers.

All blue lib smurfs care about is smoking dope. Most don't even know America has a electoral process.

Go big Red Go