2006-08-16 13:34:26 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Psychology
Forever because i love the wilderness and test myself as often as i can, kind of like that survivor-man on T.V. but he has it easy. Three months in the bush with just my buck pocket knife and it was like a walk in the park, so with no supplies it would make it more of a challenge and that is want makes it worth it.
2006-08-17 15:15:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would survive long enough to be found. There is plenty to eat (pine nuts, insects, etc.). Shelter isn't a problem if you have trees, either conifers or deciduous. Water can be obtained if you know how.
I'd also add that I wouldn't be without supplies. If I wander more than a 1000 feet from my home, in a National Forest, I take a rucksack with enough material to not only survive but to also be comfortable.
2006-08-16 13:44:33 · answer #2 · answered by Steve 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am sure I would survive as long as I had to. A Forest is full of useful nature. As long as I stay away from insane bears and the occasional cougar I should be OK. Most wild animals avoid us as well, except those wild cats they seem to see us a toys to play with and kill. Its their nature. I bet I would lose lots of weight. I could create the lost in the forest diet. Can't lose either way you win. Dead or alive you'll take that weight off :)
2006-08-16 13:49:35 · answer #3 · answered by sponggie 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The international locations management over the numerous many years has a ask your self skills for forgiving debt and growing to be it at an insane value. This hasn't handed off over night. agencies nevertheless have earnings advance 12 months with the aid of 12 months.with the aid of the way only for giggles monopolization is against the regulation, except you have an exceedingly stable lobiest. So if agencies preserve there projected earnings advance then who feels the pinch, center type. yet this is the lemon if we as a us of a weren't so spoiled as a us of a, we would have extra administration. human beings get disillusioned approximately over payed athletes and ceo/ top place of work salaries and indulgent holidays. Who will pay them????" We do with the aid of watching there video games or determining to purchase there products. Lemmings at best we are mmmmmuu, youthful Jedi.
2016-10-02 04:29:59 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends on the forest and time of year. Some people live off the land permanently out there, others die in a day.
2006-08-16 13:40:20 · answer #5 · answered by Catspaw 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
2 days
2006-08-16 13:39:33 · answer #6 · answered by Jose 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think I'd survive for at least two weeks and probably longer. It depends on a lot of factors. What time of year is it? Are there predatory animals near? Do I have hope of being rescued?
2006-08-16 13:41:21 · answer #7 · answered by Skylark 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well you can live without a lot. As long as you have water and food. Shelter is important too. If you have those things, you might make it. Shelter you can make.
I would try to survive as long as possible. And I think I could for a good long time as long as water could be found.
2006-08-16 13:43:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
longer then a week it's not difficult to survive in the forest unless I'm in grizzly country lol
2006-08-16 13:39:57 · answer #9 · answered by cutiepie81289 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i can survive as long as possible because i make myself fit to the forest environment..
2006-08-16 13:47:07 · answer #10 · answered by manuk 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋