English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

(A pretty normal reaction to a rare situation),, But not for leading America to war under false pretences,, and having countless numbers of Americas finest killed,, only to be worse off then you were before ?

2006-08-16 12:44:26 · 9 answers · asked by Shawn S 3 in Politics & Government Government

9 answers

Actually, a President was impeached, but not cause of oral sex. The charges that the House of Representatives brought were "perjury to a grand jury" and "obstruction of justice". I will agree that is hair-splitting, but in the United States, it can lead to some serious prison time.

Concerning the current President, there is no crime in initiating combat operations authorised by the U.S. Congress, at least as far as the law is concerned. It doesn't matter if the causation is false (think Gulf of Tonkin, the Maine, the border incident in Texas). The U.S. people had the chance to remove him from office in 2004 and chose to not do so. Maybe that was a bad move and maybe not. In reality, I fear that the endgame has not even begun.

2006-08-16 15:02:13 · answer #1 · answered by Ѕємι~Мαđ ŠçїєŋŧιѕТ 6 · 2 0

I think you misstatement of the facts speak volumes about your own personal dishonesty. Either that, or an astounding ignorance of the facts.

Clinton was NOT impeached for for "getting oral sex," he was impeached for lying under oath to a grand jury. This is the same crime that put Martha Stewart in jail, and the same crime that Scooter Libby is charged with.

You may not like the war, but the U.N., Russia, Germany, England, and the United States Congress all believed that Iraq had WMDs. Both the U.N. and the United States Congress authorized military action against Iraq, and the President was acting within his authority.

You can lie about the President all you want, but it doesn't make your accusations true, it just shows the world that you are either a liar or a fool.

2006-08-16 20:08:43 · answer #2 · answered by Jay S 5 · 1 0

UMMMMM It wasn't for the BJ. He LIED under OATH/;
And if you Nut Jobs had ANY case even a TINY one you don't think they would have allready done it. They have NO CASE against GWB. GET OVER IT and Move on with your life.

2006-08-16 20:09:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

What do you mean TRY?? He was impeached and that was for lying under oath which is a Federal Crime.

2006-08-17 02:54:30 · answer #4 · answered by Rebecca - 3 · 1 0

He did lie about sex. They knew he got a Blow___ and kept pushing. What do you expect, would you willingly tell the world some short fat girl played with your private parts?

This guy is way worst then that! I don't think anybody died from that Blow___. How about the lie about WMD, how many died and will continue to die.

2006-08-16 20:42:18 · answer #5 · answered by Matrix 3 · 0 3

It says nothing about our morals but volumes about what happens when too much power is consitrated in the hands of one party.

2006-08-16 19:51:10 · answer #6 · answered by region50 6 · 0 2

oooh brother another knucklehead posts an ignorant question....when will you nutjobs realize no one cares if bubba got head under his desk........"HE LIED UNDER OATH"

2006-08-16 20:04:32 · answer #7 · answered by bushfan88 5 · 3 0

he lied but tell me who is honest at all times so what he had a b/j were are all only human man see the outside but god see the heart he ran this country better than bush

2006-08-16 20:03:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

HE LIED UNDER OATH TO A GRAND JURY. THAT IS A CRIME CALLED PERJURY!

2006-08-16 19:49:27 · answer #9 · answered by Bawney 6 · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers