alrite, i think that the future really has happened, we just don't know it yet cuz we personally haven't experianced it yet..but i do think that there r ppl in the year, like, 2307 or w/e...does nebody agree with this?
2006-08-16 12:25:21 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Other - Science
drop acid lately?
2006-08-16 12:30:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Mystics have been saying for centuries that time is an illusion, and as braxton_paul points out, physicists are starting to see time as merely a mode of perception. However, saying the future "has happened" puts a temporal construct on the concept.
2006-08-16 13:32:04 · answer #2 · answered by injanier 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is no scientific evidence to prove or disprove your theory, but Einstein showed that time is nothing more than a human concept and doesn't truly exist as a specific feature of our universe. In other words, there are no such things as the "future" or the "past."
2006-08-16 12:44:10 · answer #3 · answered by Chug-a-Lug 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
T.O.E =The Theory of Everything the natural next step to Einstein"s Relativity Theory!!!.Past ,Present and Future are one!!!
2006-08-16 12:30:30 · answer #4 · answered by JAM123 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hmm... I am not sure about human in year 2307. I am sure that there are human remains left there. Got that ? human remains...
Am i funny or what ?
Don't answer me.
2006-08-16 12:34:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Not sure, maybe. Could be that all possible futures already exist. I am not big on the idea of a finite destiny...
2006-08-17 18:14:15 · answer #6 · answered by whoevermeam 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Time is relative , So is speed and so are ones perceptions of reality you psuedo-scientific waste of human carcas...
2006-08-16 14:11:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't think you should be theorizing if you can't even spell "anybody."
And that's not an original theory anyway.
2006-08-16 12:30:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋