Do you think we should pull our troops back and "NUKE" both Iraq and Iran just to make threaten Alkaida...?

Question

If we pull our troops back, gas prices should decrease, death's included. By pulling our troops back, we could "NUKE" both Iran and Iraq to threaten Alkaida and make them pay! The civilians will have to perish in beliveing in Benladin!

Answer 1

No.

Grow up.

Answer 2

As far as the dumbest question I ever heard, this one has to be near the top. 1st of all. The world would not allow the US to nuke Iran and Iraq. Even at the risk of pissing off the US puppet master Israel. Because the oil fields if they were not set ablaze. Would most likely be off limits due to radiation for the next 200 years. The Saudis cannot make up the stagger, neither Russia or the Mexico. Let see how well you love that theory when you are paying $8 bucks or more a gallon. There are reserves here in the US in the Mid West, but it is way too expensive to get out of the oil shale. Then what will you do about China when the jet stream carries the radiation to them and Japan? Guess you have to nuke China too because they will be pissed. And evacuate near all the Pacific islands and maybe Hawaii too. Snap! Won't that ruin tourist season? And if there was even the hint that any would reach the West Coast, how would you handle the panic as everyone tried to flee the Western states? That ideal of yours makes about as much sense as standing in a hay barn with a book of matches, and lighting the hay while you are in there because you want to burn up someone you do not like standing 6 feet away from you.

Answer 3

You are a dangerous person !!!!!! Its is people exactly like you who die with a suicide-bomb attached, you zealot !!!!!

The Illuminati are forging the "right major crisis" they need to make the Nations accept their New World order, ruled by the martial law.
They are the Illuminatis, and they own us,
This is the New World Order, and it is your future if the world don't wake up :
Bush and Kerry | Skull and Bone : http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8150571337669145794&q=Bush+skull

"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor"
Project for the New American Century (2000)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century

“Naturally the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
Hermann Göring(Nazi) 1946 Confessions (Nuremberg Diary)
http://www.snopes2.com/quotes/goering.htm

"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."
David Rockefeller: Statement to the United Nations Business Council in September 1994

"For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with other around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." David Rockefellers memoirs (2002)

Make you investigations about Jesuits, the New World Order, the Illuminatis, the Free-Masonery, the Death Clan. They plan a world reduction of population of 80%...Far worse than Hitler...
They are preparing us for 2012, for the New Age, of Relelations, and the return of « God » from Nibiru.
“the zenith meridian at Giza runs through Jupiter at the Hyades in Taurus”, this means “the kingdom (Jupiter) will be restored to Egypt (Taurus) at that precise moment. Thus, Osiris, the Bull of Egypt, will return from the dead at 22:18:13 on December 21, 2012.” El Cairo time.

Answer 4

Nope,because,we are fighting small group of people and we are destroy the innocent people around the Iraq and Iran as well as Lebanon,Palestine,and Afghanistan.Al-Queda is a small group who hits and runs when the world is not looking then they fled.The best way is move the troop back in my opinion and send the special force to capture the head of the ganf Bin Ladin and others.Meanwhile,pay the civilians who know where are these men lives? It will cost U.S. less than using Nuke.

Answer 5

One they believed in Benladin because he was their leader, they didn't know any better. Here we don't have to believe in the president (it's like whoo hoo! I already know what your doing so why bother telling me?). Plus "Nuking" people isn't the best way to solve things. If all in the world if you want to do some "Nuking" do it to Alkaida instead of inisant women and children. In my eyes someone has to be entirely sick in the brain to even think about that. Right now in my standards your Hitler Jr.

Answer 6

Come on kid grow up.
You can't generalyze about everybody's believes in there.

Nuke it? REally bad idea.
You want to restart a cold war or a WW3 perhaps.
You know that provide weapons to the countries around there.

I think you should put money and help to rebuilt a new government over there, and help their army to fight.
This way, the population will see that there is a true stable government in their country instead the one from foreign countries. They will be more happy and you will get less attack against your troops.

Answer 7

What on earth are you doing?????

There is enough hate in this world and you want to cause more??

If you were the president of the United States, are gas prices would be over $10.00 per gallon.

Put your thinking cap on for crying out loud. HELLO!!!!! You should be reported. You have every right to your opinion but this one is really off the wall. I consider you a very wicked person.

Answer 8

Do you have any idea of the devastation an attack of this nature would cause to the entire world? You use the term so casually like it was just another pin point attack,it will totally decimate those country's and its people.I understand collateral damage but that's ridicule's.The problem in this world goes beyond one person,bin ladin is not worth millions of people dying in a nuclear bomb attack as you propose.No I do not think that what you propose
is a good idea,in fact it is unthinkable as a solution.
and sounds insane to normal intelligent people .
I love my country and I feel there are ways that we can one day live at peace with the rest of the world.With our freedoms and individualized thinking in tact.

Answer 9

Let's just leave them alone and wait until they implode upon themselves. What those countries are doing to their young members would have worked great two hundred years ago, today things are different.

Imagine a gang of young men and women sitting on one side of a fence, with nothing to do and none of their dreams being fulfilled.

On the other side of the fence, young people are eating in a grand style, they are living a free and peaceful life and they are enjoying every minute of their lives.

How long do you think it will take before the deprived gang of youngsters tear down the fence and join the luxury gang?

That is what is going to happen soon. Those young people in Iran, Syria, etc want a full life and they will revolt to get it.

Answer 10

firstly why are you pointing out Iran? 2nd, i'm lively accountability and spent 3 excursions in Iraq third, i've got confidence what we are doing is the spectacular subject ok, Pulling out 50K in troops isn't pulling out. it would make issues slightly extra risky for the troops nevertheless there. And if we pull out thoroughly we the section would fall to conflict. all and sundry thinks it is Bush's conflict. it relatively is no longer Saddam began it...think of pertaining to to the 8 years of wrestle operations below Clinton, the no fly zones in the north and south. Air strikes, cruise missile strikes, and containment. seem up protection rigidity operations in Centcom. Did his sort artwork? I say no. What it did became into supply them 8 years to coach. No purely like Korea, Japan, Germany, Italy, and Bosnia we are able to be in Iraq for a protracted, long term. in spite of who will become President. they might misinform us...Clinton ninety six "one 12 months in Bosnia"...97 "next Christmas"...ninety 8 "one extra 12 months" till ultimately the media stop asking. we are nevertheless in the former Yugoslavia, and could be for a protracted time.

Answer 11

ahh nuke um...one of my fave solutions for safety of our troops lives, well even if we thought of that solution, it's a desert waste land basically, and a cost of a bomb big enough isn't worth it plain and simple. this is the main reason korea wasn't bombed in the 50's, because it had no industrial centers ect to bomb and that is completely against geneva codes to bomb a civilian territory. we did in japan because of the heavy industrial areas but also because the geneva convention had not happened yet.

also about the gas...well it would skyrocket due to the fact that we would have to go to our reserves because the gas would be radioactive from the weapons and not be useable for years if not decades