English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

There is a difference. So whatcha think???

2006-08-16 10:07:56 · 42 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

Hell yeah, I'm all about the malts!

2006-08-16 10:11:32 · update #1

42 answers

They're both good.

2006-08-16 10:11:52 · answer #1 · answered by Ray 7 · 0 0

Shakes

2006-08-16 10:12:14 · answer #2 · answered by Nico 7 · 0 0

Strawberry Shake, Yummy

2006-08-16 10:11:52 · answer #3 · answered by Z-Cat 5 · 0 0

I like shakes much better.
I had a malt once with chunks of malt balls in it. and it wasn' that great. so shakes are more to my liking!

2006-08-16 10:12:08 · answer #4 · answered by ixoyechirho 3 · 0 0

Malts...

Love your name by the way - that's been my nickname for my son for like 5 years now...

Have a great day, Marilyn

2006-08-16 10:11:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

a shake dont have malt in it

2006-08-16 10:11:42 · answer #6 · answered by Neil G 6 · 0 0

Malts! and they gotta make sure that it's not mixed well so you get the clumps of malt mmmmm

2006-08-16 10:11:17 · answer #7 · answered by I am NOT Jimbo 1 · 0 0

Shakes.

2006-08-16 10:11:00 · answer #8 · answered by AsianPersuasion :) 7 · 0 0

Shakes.

2006-08-16 10:10:44 · answer #9 · answered by Katie L 2 · 0 0

malts arent that thick like shakes r

2006-08-16 10:11:03 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

MALT ( shaken not stirred - there is a difference unlike martinis ) ( like the grainy comment above !)

2006-08-16 10:13:14 · answer #11 · answered by fact checker 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers