English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://www.dissidentvoice.org/Aug06/Christison14.htm
http://www.davidicke.com/content/view/2102/33
http://www.prisonplanet.com/911.html#trading
http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-i.htm
http://www.msnbc.com/news/664935.asp
http://www.cnn.com/POLLSERVER/results/14340.exclude.html
http://prisonplanet.com/Trade_Center_warning_baffles_police.htm
http://www.prisonplanet.com/german_firm_probes_final_world_trade_center_deals.htm
http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/WhyQuestion911.html
http://www.youtube.com/w/?v=x-RjohsWGO4
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/DAV504A.html
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1822764959599063248
These are but a few interesting links. It may be possible to debunk a few of these but not all. These "theories" are more than enough to warrant a new indepentent investigation. It would be unamerican for any political party or group to deny such an investigation yet people who ask these questions are demonized in the media. WHY?

2006-08-16 09:59:43 · 8 answers · asked by captpcb216 2 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

Fair and Balanced like FOX news yea right. I didn't post any links like from debunking 911 myths because they are not credible. Various websites like the ones above have torn these supposed debunks to shreds.

2006-08-16 10:54:34 · update #1

If the government dropped the ball and grose negeligence caused 3 WTC buildings to fall that day thats just more reason for a through investigation. If I screwed up at my job I would get fired. They should be held accountable.

2006-08-16 11:00:01 · update #2

8 answers

In general I find conservatives attack their poltical opponents personally rather than challenge their ideas. The best current example of this is the book by Ann Coulter "Godless". The title alone is a smear job.

It is a poor debating tactic.

2006-08-16 10:12:50 · answer #1 · answered by Rory McRandall 3 · 1 0

Because for the past 5 years, the facts have 100% not supported the conspiracy loonies.

At some point, you need to re-align with reality and accept the banal truth that 9/11 happened exaclty as the 9/11 commission and the government said it did.

2006-08-16 10:09:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

it is still a sore subject. bringing it up again leads to questions as to why? it would mean that something wasn't done right or overlooked in the first go round. might just be that the deeper one digs, the real "truth" may be uncovered. and it just may show a lot of negligence and carelessness on the part of the govt.

2006-08-16 10:06:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Because they are pieces of dog SHEET who should eliminated off the face of the planet

2006-08-16 10:04:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

why didn't you put up the loose change web site...and why are there no web sites that debunk the conspiracy myths? Be fair and balanced

2006-08-16 10:06:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

What? A Conservative didn't address the facts??? You've got to be kidding!!!!

2006-08-16 10:10:33 · answer #6 · answered by Missouri LitWit 3 · 0 0

Interesting how there are no FoxNews articles.

Could it be that all these websites are supported by the Far Left?

2006-08-16 10:06:35 · answer #7 · answered by mthtchr05 5 · 0 2

I reject those "facts".
And after reading the old "facts",
I believe the other "facts", until someone can show me some new "facts".

2006-08-16 10:08:52 · answer #8 · answered by ed 7 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers